“Finding the Right Window Into What They’re Doing”: Assessment of Maker-based Learning Experiences Remotely

Abstract

During the pandemic, teachers whose practice depends on maker-based learning have had the added challenge of translating their hands-on lessons for remote teaching. Yet with students making remotely, how can a teacher monitor the students' progress, offer timely feedback, or infer what the students understood? In short, how are teachers assessing this work? Working with a learning community of teachers who center hands-on making in their instruction regardless of academic discipline, this study was conducted to examine how teachers are supporting and assessing maker-based learning. Our study draws on observational field notes taken during the community's meetings, interviews with four focal teachers, and artifacts from the teachers' maker projects. Taking a values-based assessment approach, our findings reveal interesting shifts in teaching practice. Specifically, teachers incorporated social-emotional goals into the activities they design and monitor, students documented their artifacts and process, and teachers adapted to using low-tech materials to ensure accessibility while engaging remote students in their learning goals. These findings imply that not only can remote maker-based experiences can influence the role of students as assessors and the tools and materials they use for making but also how these practices revealed in remote settings could inform in-person settings.

Work-In-Progress: Make It Count - Supporting Makerspace Course Outcomes With Blended Learning

“…Faculty have made observations that the project shifts during the pandemic prompted them to reexamine and refine their overall learning goals for students. This feedback is consistent with emerging hybrid makerspace research [10]. Switching to remote and hybrid learning motivated a diversification of assessment tools, resulting in a range of studentcreated artifacts from both makerspace trainings and maker-integrated courses.…”

“…Makerspace staff review the artifacts generated by patrons during their visit, checking for consistency with the learning objectives stated in the training. The addition of these artifacts to the training serves as a valuable assessment instrument [10] for both patrons and staff, one that was not included in the previous training model.…”

Learning Practices in a Museum Art Studio: Designing a Learning Framework for an Arts-Based Learning Team

“…These LPs are based on what the Teaching Artists (TA) value for learning and engagement. (Wardrip et al, 2018;Wardrip et al, 2021). These learning activities are often referred to as overt (Menekse et al, 2013;Chi & Wylie, 2014).…”