2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2005.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding ridges and valleys in a discrete surface using a modified MLS approximation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implicit surface fitting is a promising method for ridge-valley lines detection, but the computation time cost is high. Kim et al [23] employ enhanced movingleast-squares approximation to estimate curvatures and corresponding derivatives on each vertex. They reduce the time-complexity compared to Ohtake et al [16] in approximation, which can be seen from their table of curvatures and their derivatives estimation statistics (Table 1).…”
Section: Curves On 3d Meshesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implicit surface fitting is a promising method for ridge-valley lines detection, but the computation time cost is high. Kim et al [23] employ enhanced movingleast-squares approximation to estimate curvatures and corresponding derivatives on each vertex. They reduce the time-complexity compared to Ohtake et al [16] in approximation, which can be seen from their table of curvatures and their derivatives estimation statistics (Table 1).…”
Section: Curves On 3d Meshesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curvatures and their derivatives are estimated at mesh vertices by fitting smooth surfaces locally or over the entire mesh such as compactly supported radial basis functions [32], polynomials [25], [28], [33], MLS based implicit functions [34] or using discrete methods [24], [25]. Ridges are traced by detecting zero crossings of the ridge function on the vertices and edges of the meshes.…”
Section: Implicitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main approaches here are local polynomial fitting [2,3,16], the use of discrete differential operators [12], and various combinations of continuous and discrete techniques [23,37]. While estimating surface curvatures and their derivatives with geometrically inspired discrete differential operators [12,27] is much more elegant than using fitting methods, the former usually requires noise elimination and the latter seems more robust.…”
Section: Problem Setting and Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%