2016
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b06543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Our Way in the Dark Proteome

Abstract: The traditional structure-function paradigm has provided significant insights for well-folded proteins in which structures can be easily and rapidly revealed by X-ray crystallography beamlines. However approximately one third of the human proteome are comprised of intrinsically disordered proteins and regions (IDPs/IDRs) that do not adopt a dominant well-folded structure, and therefore remain “unseen” by traditional structural biology methods. This Perspective article considers the challenges raised by the “Da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
2
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the relative populations of the monomeric metastable states are not well‐converged across different studies. From the methodological standpoint of computational ensemble modeling, a persistent problem discussed in a very recent proteomics review (Bhowmick et al, ) stems from the limited amount of experimental data available for individual IDPs, which makes it extremely difficult to arrive at a unique solution with distinguishable features between close ensembles. The latest Bayesian formalism‐based ensemble building methods hold great potential to address this issue, but are currently in their infancy (Brookes & Head‐Gordon, ; Gurry et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the relative populations of the monomeric metastable states are not well‐converged across different studies. From the methodological standpoint of computational ensemble modeling, a persistent problem discussed in a very recent proteomics review (Bhowmick et al, ) stems from the limited amount of experimental data available for individual IDPs, which makes it extremely difficult to arrive at a unique solution with distinguishable features between close ensembles. The latest Bayesian formalism‐based ensemble building methods hold great potential to address this issue, but are currently in their infancy (Brookes & Head‐Gordon, ; Gurry et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ordered proteins have well‐defined 3D structures and exhibit small‐scale structural fluctuations under physiological conditions. On the contrary, intrinsically disordered proteins could sample an ensemble of conformations which may be compact (molten globule‐like) or extended (coil‐like or pre‐molten globule‐like) . Furthermore, proteins can be entirely disordered polypeptides (IDPs) or a combination of disordered regions (IDRs) and ordered domains …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the highly dynamic nature, IDP cannot be described by a single or a few well‐defined structures . Instead, the accurate characterization of IDP required the structural ensemble, which includes a limited number of low free energy states and the statistic weights corresponding to these states . Therefore, precisely determining the structure ensembles of IDPs is crucial for the understanding of IDP functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%