2019
DOI: 10.1002/pro.3718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Features of molecular recognition of intrinsically disordered proteins via coupled folding and binding

Abstract: The sequence–structure–function paradigm of proteins has been revolutionized by the discovery of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) or intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). In contrast to traditional ordered proteins, IDPs/IDRs are unstructured under physiological conditions. The absence of well‐defined three‐dimensional structures in the free state of IDPs/IDRs is fundamental to their function. Folding upon binding is an important mode of molecular recognition for IDPs/IDRs. While great efforts have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 206 publications
(442 reference statements)
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another example is the mutually induced conformational change in both calmodulin and its target proteins, which is required to achieve both high affinity and high specificity 39 . On the other hand, in intrinsically-disordered proteins (IDPs), which bind structured partner molecules, the induced-folding, or folding-upon-binding, mechanism is dominant 40,41 , but combined conformational selection with folding-upon-binding was found to direct the redox switch CP12 42 . In IDPs that do not form ordered complex structures, a fuzzy-complex-formation mechanism is also observed, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is the mutually induced conformational change in both calmodulin and its target proteins, which is required to achieve both high affinity and high specificity 39 . On the other hand, in intrinsically-disordered proteins (IDPs), which bind structured partner molecules, the induced-folding, or folding-upon-binding, mechanism is dominant 40,41 , but combined conformational selection with folding-upon-binding was found to direct the redox switch CP12 42 . In IDPs that do not form ordered complex structures, a fuzzy-complex-formation mechanism is also observed, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is commonly accepted that IDRs are enriched in proteins involved in signaling and regulatory functions (see ref. [ 37 ] and references therein) and that they are able to mediate functional protein-protein interactions. This is often done by molecular recognition features (MoRFs) or short linear motifs, which usually undergo disorder-to-order transitions upon binding to their partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, PTMs allow IDPs to function in rheostatic regulation [17] which are graded quantitative responses, and may also drive the formation or disruption of membrane-less organelles through processes known as liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) [18,19]. Finally, the disordered nature of IDPs allows them to exploit diverse binding mechanisms by which they can fold-upon-binding [20][21][22], but also form complexes in which structural disorder is maintained to different degrees [23]. Here, the most extreme case is the formation of a completely disordered complex of functional relevance and extreme affinity [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%