Abstract:The purpose of this study was to explore women's identity shifts as they navigate their postdivorce lives. We conducted in-depth, loosely structured interviews with 31 women who had been through at least 1 divorce. Interviews included questions about how women experienced life after divorce, specifically addressing changes they made to separate from the marriage and form a postdivorce identity. Patterns emerged regarding the process of identity change in 3 distinct domains: physical appearance, physical surrou… Show more
“…As Gregson and Ceynar (2009) learned from women who divorced, there can be a desire to move on by making changes in physical surroundings and appearance that might also result in divorced individuals changing their view of themselves and consequently their social network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gregson and Ceynar (2009) interviewed 31 divorced women and found that their physical appearance often changed after divorce as the women struggled with their identity. Changing friendships and social networks could also be a part of that identity change.…”
“…As Gregson and Ceynar (2009) learned from women who divorced, there can be a desire to move on by making changes in physical surroundings and appearance that might also result in divorced individuals changing their view of themselves and consequently their social network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gregson and Ceynar (2009) interviewed 31 divorced women and found that their physical appearance often changed after divorce as the women struggled with their identity. Changing friendships and social networks could also be a part of that identity change.…”
“…The model of living for the children provides further accounts for the initial five years of transition processes and how these women move through stages and transitions are explained. Second, the major similarity among the models and the findings in this study is the importance of reconstructing or redefining a new identity in post-divorce adjustment (Baum, Rahave, & Sharon, 2005;Gregson et al, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the study results not only support for those models but also provide further understanding of how these women make transitions to their new life of working single mothers. Although there is a large body of research on marital dissolution and post-dissolution adjustment, the mechanisms by which people make adjustment have been much less studied (Fasching, 2011;Gregson & Ceynar, 2009). The models in comparison (Guttmann, 1993;Radford et al, 1997) acknowledge the complexity and multidimensionality of the post-divorce transitions but except four-phase staging, dimensions after legal separation were simplified and their sub-stages were not explained.…”
Purpose: This study was a grounded theory research aimed at generating a substantive theory that accounts for the explanatory social processes in which immigrant Korean single-mother families were engaged in the United States. Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with 15 immigrant Korean single mothers who were living with children under 18 years of age at the time of the interviews. Data collection guided by theoretical sampling and concurrent constant comparative analysis of the transcribed data was conducted to identify the core social process. Results: The emerged core social process was "living for the children," which represented the driving process by which these women made transition to their new lives as single-mother families. The major task throughout the entire transition was re-creating their families. The women's transition involved practical and psychological transitions. The practical transition involved three stages: assuring family survival, struggling between the father role and the mother role, and stabilizing. The psychological transition involved becoming strong and settling in with a new supportive network. Conclusion: Study results added to the literature by elaborating the women's emphasis on maternal identity and the resilience-provoking nature of the women's transitions.
“…Gradually, they become recognised by others and recognise themselves as full members of the community, contributing to it by asking and answering questions, taking part in forum discussions, and offering and receiving support. At the same time, they develop a view of themselves as a divorcing person, an understanding of possible emotional, practical and legal trajectories through the divorce experience, and an increased sense of cohesion and control in relation to the identity shifts that accompany divorce (Frieman, 2002;Sakraida, 2005;Willen & Montgomery, 2006;Kramrei et al, 2007;Gregson & Ceynar, 2009).…”
This article is about the informal learning that took place in an online divorce support and advice forum. In it, the author discusses the formation of a community of practice among the members during the first nine months of the site's operation. The author shows how the key markers of mutual engagement, joint enterprise and shared repertoire developed between members, and argues that the community of practice both enhanced and inhibited learning among its members. In particular, the author suggests that members learned not only the knowledge about divorce law provided by others on the site as a form of public good, but they also learned ways of coping with divorce, with their exspouse and with the legal system generally. At the same time, however, some group practices inhibited learning, both for those participating in the community and for those excluded by members. The author concludes with suggestions for developing similar online communities of practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.