Financing Selection Method in Discipline Evaluation Using a Weighted Induced Model

Chen, Yu-Fen; Jin, Huanhuan; Chen, Chao; Zhang, Chonghui

doi:10.15240/tul/001/2019-2-003

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus the second-level disciplines receive limited resources. Restructuring a second-level discipline to a first-level discipline requires an institution-led initiative to apply to the national administration [ 30 ]. Currently, the maturity of a secondary discipline can only be judged empirically by the researcher [ 31 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maturity model for assessing the medical humanities: a Delphi study

Zhang,

Duan

2024

BMC Med Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Becoming a first-level discipline in China means access to more educational resources. The development of medical humanities in China has been going on for more than 40 years, and some medical schools have set up master’s and doctoral programs in medical humanities. The demand for medical humanities-related knowledge in China is also growing after COVID-19. However, medical humanities is only a second-level discipline and receives limited resources to meet the needs of society. This study aims to establish a system of indicators that can assess whether the medical humanities has a first-level discipline and provide a basis for its upgrading to a first-level. Methods A Delphi technique was used, with the panel of expert expressing their views in a series of two questionnaires. A coefficient of variation of less than 0.2 indicates expert agreement. Result A total of 25 experts participated in this Delphi study. Consensus was reached on 11 first-grade indices and 48 s-grade indices. The authoritative coefficient(Cr) of the experts was 0.804, which indicates that the experts have a high level of reliability. Conclusion This study provides a reliable foundation for the evaluation of medical humanities maturity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maturity model for assessing the medical humanities: a Delphi study

Zhang,

Duan

2024

BMC Med Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus the second-level disciplines receive limited resources. Restructuring a second-level discipline to a rst-level discipline requires an institution-led initiative to apply to the national administration [22]. Currently, the maturity of a secondary discipline can only be judged empirically by the researcher [23].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maturity Model for Assessing the Medical Humanities: a Delphi study

Zhang,

Duan

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Becoming a first-level discipline in China means access to more educational resources. The development of medical humanities in China has been going on for more than 40 years, and most medical schools have set up master's and doctoral programs in medical humanities. The demand for medical humanities-related knowledge in China is also growing after COVID-19. However, medical humanities is only a second-level discipline and receives limited resources to meet the needs of society. This study aims to establish a system of indicators that can assess whether the medical humanities has a first-level discipline and provide a basis for its upgrading to a first-level. Methods: A Delphi technique was used, with the panel of expert expressing their views in a series of two questionnaires. A coefficient of variation of less than 0.2 indicates expert agreement. Result: A total of 25 experts participated in this Delphi study. Consensus was reached on 11 first-grade indices and 48 second-grade indices. The authoritative coefficient(Cr) of the experts was 0.804, which indicates that the experts have a high level of reliability. Conclusion: This study provides a reliable foundation for the evaluation of medical humanities maturity.

show abstract

“…By hiring The associate editor coordinating the review of this manuscript and approving it for publication was Francisco J. Garcia-Penalvo . staff dedicated to teaching, training personnel, and conducting research on teaching, a discipline can promote innovation at both a university and regional level [5], [6]. Therefore, it is more practical and meaningful to evaluate the scientific research abilities of different universities or regions from the perspective of a particular discipline.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Nonradial Super Efficiency DEA Framework Using a MCDM to Measure the Research Efficiency of Disciplines at Chinese Universities

Ding-xin

et al. 2020

IEEE Access

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluating the efficiency of scientific research plays an important role in accelerating technological innovation and optimizing the allocation of research resources. Most studies have focused on measuring research efficiency from a macro perspective, ignoring differences within disciplines. Furthermore, existing methods have failed to discriminate between evaluation results and the fact that research has variable returns to scale. To address this, in this paper we propose a multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) nonradial super efficiency data envelopment analysis (NRSDEA) model, which uses an outputoriented nonradial SDEA method to manage nonsolution problems and integer decision variable constraints. In addition, we used a Malmquist index to decompose the productivity changes of statistics discipline's research efficiency at different universities in China. Finally, we verified the rationality and effectiveness of the proposed method. INDEX TERMS Discipline research efficiency, multiple-criteria decision-making, nonradial SDEA, Malmquist index.

show abstract

Financing Selection Method in Discipline Evaluation Using a Weighted Induced Model

Cited by 4 publications

References 21 publications

Maturity model for assessing the medical humanities: a Delphi study

Maturity model for assessing the medical humanities: a Delphi study

Maturity Model for Assessing the Medical Humanities: a Delphi study

A Nonradial Super Efficiency DEA Framework Using a MCDM to Measure the Research Efficiency of Disciplines at Chinese Universities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About