2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2014.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financing constraints and investments in R&D: Evidence from Indian manufacturing firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
87
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
6
87
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that about 81% of past R&D behaviour affects the current level of R&D investments. The result is consistent with the R&D smoothing idea and is similar to findings from Sasidharan et al (). The results from Column 1 also confirm our general prediction that emerging market firms do not tend to use external funds to finance R&D, as is evident from the statistically significant negative coefficient for the variable.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This implies that about 81% of past R&D behaviour affects the current level of R&D investments. The result is consistent with the R&D smoothing idea and is similar to findings from Sasidharan et al (). The results from Column 1 also confirm our general prediction that emerging market firms do not tend to use external funds to finance R&D, as is evident from the statistically significant negative coefficient for the variable.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, R&D intensity was found to have a negative relationship with the cash flow ratio. These results contrasted with those derived by Himmelberg and Petersen (1994) [32], Hottenrott and Peters (2012) [84], and Sasidharan, Lukose, and Komera (2015) [85]. However, our results reflected those of Podolski (2016) [86] and Seifert and Gonenc (2012) [18], who found a similar negative relationship between cash flow and R&D investment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, corporate investment decisions are highly dependent on investment opportunities, and previous studies generally measure investment opportunities as Tobin's Q. However, since it is difficult to measure Tobin's Q in the limit of samples for the study, the past three year average sales growth rate as the proxy variable of the investment opportunity of the company [36]. In addition, since the capital structure of a firm affects the R&D investment in the previous study [37], the debt ratio of a firm is added as a control variable.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%