2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-017-9435-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial reporting fraud and other forms of misconduct: a multidisciplinary review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
132
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
4
132
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have focused on quality factors of financial reporting, such as earning management [26][27][28], financial restatements [29][30][31], and fraud [32][33][34][35]. These authors have used these quality factors, which restrict the production of high-quality corporate financial reports, as evidence in the collapse of financial reporting.…”
Section: Earnings Management and Corporate Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have focused on quality factors of financial reporting, such as earning management [26][27][28], financial restatements [29][30][31], and fraud [32][33][34][35]. These authors have used these quality factors, which restrict the production of high-quality corporate financial reports, as evidence in the collapse of financial reporting.…”
Section: Earnings Management and Corporate Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a survey article on the current state of financial reporting misconduct research, Amiram et al (2017) point to the gap in our understanding of the estimation errors involved in financial fraudrelated research. While researchers have used several measures to gauge the likelihood, extent, and damages from financial reporting misconduct, there has been less focus on assessing the performance of the metrics used in such research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karpoff, Koester, Lee, and Martin (2017) find that databases of firms identified as having engaged in misstatement (i.e., ex-post samples) have several systematic biases that are economically meaningful; predictive models such as the AB-score and ABF-score alleviate such biases. Given the small sample characteristics and biases in ex-post misconduct samples, Amiram, Bozanic, Cox, DuPont, Karpoff, and Sloan (2017) highlight the need for "more robust, and possibly yet-to-be discovered, techniques and methodologies" for fraud-related research. Our study directly addresses this call.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both are information systems journals. The other literature reviews (Hogan, Rezaee, Riley, & Velury, 2008;Trompeter, Carpenter, Desai, Jones, & Riley, 2013;Trompeter, Carpenter, Jones, & Riley, 2014;Amiram, Bozanic, Cox, Dupont, Karpoff & Sloan, 2018) are published in the following accounting journals: Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Accounting Horizons, and Review of Accounting Studies.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%