2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-015-0164-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial development, poverty and rural-urban income inequality: evidence from South Asian countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
8
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher deposits with the intermediaries means channelling of surplus funds to the deficit units of the economy hence, transforming deposits into loans and other advances (Naira, 2016). The results are in line with the earlier studies of Bhanumurty and Singh (2013) and Sehrawat and Giri (2015) which suggest a bidirectional causality and emphasis that economic growth has a critical role in financial development and that financial development leads to further development of economic growth of an economy. From the results of this relation it can be inferred that policy makers should emphasis on the measures which enhance the economic growth but they also focus on the development of banking system by considering the long term perspective of the mutual causality between the two which will ultimately benefit the economy as a whole.…”
Section: Panel Vector Error Correction Model (Vecm)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Higher deposits with the intermediaries means channelling of surplus funds to the deficit units of the economy hence, transforming deposits into loans and other advances (Naira, 2016). The results are in line with the earlier studies of Bhanumurty and Singh (2013) and Sehrawat and Giri (2015) which suggest a bidirectional causality and emphasis that economic growth has a critical role in financial development and that financial development leads to further development of economic growth of an economy. From the results of this relation it can be inferred that policy makers should emphasis on the measures which enhance the economic growth but they also focus on the development of banking system by considering the long term perspective of the mutual causality between the two which will ultimately benefit the economy as a whole.…”
Section: Panel Vector Error Correction Model (Vecm)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Financial globalization and the widespread consensus on the positive interplay between growth and development of the financial sector incited scholars to research the influence that improvements within the financial sector have on inequality and poverty. Positions in academic literature have generally suggested that improvements in the financial sector contribute to poverty alleviation (Beck et al, 2004;Jalilian and Kirkpatrick, 2005;Perez-Moreno, 2011;Sehrawat and Giri, 2016). However, the findings on finance-inequality have remained inconclusive.…”
Section: Review Of Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have found positive effects from microfinance on various socioeconomic outcomes: job creation, rural financial inclusion, education, nutrition, disaster resilience, and health improvements (Wydick 2002;Tedeschi 2010;Garikipati 2012;Deloach and Lamanna 2011;Sinha 2012;Othman 2015;Samer et al 2015;Hassan and Saleem 2017;Garikipati et al 2017). Beneficial effects from microfinance have been documented in developing Asia, notably in Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Thailand (Kaboski and Townsend 2012;Sengsourivong and Mieno 2014;Rahman and Khan 2013;Rahman, Khanan, and Nghiem 2017;Imtiaz et al 2014;Sehrawat and Giri 2016).…”
Section: Microfinance To Address Socioeconomic Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%