2002
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/39/1a/1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final report on key comparison CCEM-K2 of resistance standards at 10 M  and 1 G 

Abstract: An international comparison of dc resistance at 10 MΩ and 1 GΩ was organized under the auspices of the Consultative Committee for Electricity and Magnetism (CCEM) and piloted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, USA). This CCEM comparison began in August 1996 and was completed in March 2000 with the participation of fourteen other national metrology institutes (NMIs). The travelling package included three wirewound 10 MΩ standards and three film-type 1 GΩ standards designed by the NIST.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 100 pA, standard uncertainties of about "Validation of the ultrastable low-noise current amplifier as travelling standard for small direct currents" D. Drung, C. Krause, S. P. Giblin, S. Djordjevic, F. Piquemal, O. Séron, F. Rengnez, M. Götz, E. Pesel, and H. Scherer, 2015 12 / 13 10 ppm were obtained at best. Comparisons based on 1 GΩ resistors were performed both at 100 nA [13,14] and 10 nA [15,16]. Typically, standard uncertainties of about 5 ppm are achieved with non-cryogenic methods, whereas CCC calibrations allow lower values down to about 1 ppm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 100 pA, standard uncertainties of about "Validation of the ultrastable low-noise current amplifier as travelling standard for small direct currents" D. Drung, C. Krause, S. P. Giblin, S. Djordjevic, F. Piquemal, O. Séron, F. Rengnez, M. Götz, E. Pesel, and H. Scherer, 2015 12 / 13 10 ppm were obtained at best. Comparisons based on 1 GΩ resistors were performed both at 100 nA [13,14] and 10 nA [15,16]. Typically, standard uncertainties of about 5 ppm are achieved with non-cryogenic methods, whereas CCC calibrations allow lower values down to about 1 ppm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 lists the information describing the CCEM-K2 results taken from Table 5 of [ 16 ]. In the table, the listed resistance measurements are relative deviations from the norminal value.…”
Section: Linking the Ccem-k2 And Simem-k2 Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are also important to monitor the quality of calibration results according to [1]. ILCs can be carried out among NMIs as in [2][3][4]. Another kind of ILCs involves a NMI and secondary Laboratories of the same country accredited or not, so belonging to the same measurement system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%