2012
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/49/1a/07011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final report of key comparison CCM.G-K1: International comparison of absolute gravimeters ICAG2009

Abstract: The International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters 2009 (ICAG2009) was carried out in September 2009 at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM). The ICAG2009 and its data processing were performed in accordance with the agreed Technical Protocol which was approved by the Steering Committee. The pilot laboratory (BIPM) evaluated the final results of the key comparison from the measurements made at the BIPM in the framework of ICAG2009. A pilot study run in parallel allowed evaluation of the of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a reference value would allow correction values to be determined for the results of the gravimeters participating in the comparison. Preliminary results [22] show that the FG5#238 absolute gravimeter measured the acceleration of gravity in three different sites with an expanded uncertainty ranging between 5.4 µGal and 6.5 µGal. The expanded uncertainty is obtained by multiplying the combined standard uncertainty by a coverage factor k corresponding to a confidence level of 95%, in our case k = 2.…”
Section: The Absolute Gravimetermentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a reference value would allow correction values to be determined for the results of the gravimeters participating in the comparison. Preliminary results [22] show that the FG5#238 absolute gravimeter measured the acceleration of gravity in three different sites with an expanded uncertainty ranging between 5.4 µGal and 6.5 µGal. The expanded uncertainty is obtained by multiplying the combined standard uncertainty by a coverage factor k corresponding to a confidence level of 95%, in our case k = 2.…”
Section: The Absolute Gravimetermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The comparison was held from September 14th to October 3th, 2009 in Sèvres, France, and preliminary results are described in [22]. In ICAG-2009, five stations located at the BIPM were used and each gravimeter measured at three of them.…”
Section: The Absolute Gravimetermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the ICAG2009 measurement was made 8 years ago, the long-term stability of the g value at the Kibble balance site should be evaluated. Figure 8 shows the historical g measurement differences from 2001 to 2009 based on comparison reference values (CRVs) [31][32][33]. To take the long-term g stability into account, we added an extended uncertainty component of 1.6 µGal, which covers all the measurement results (with uncertainties) of the CRVs.…”
Section: Update Of the Absolute G Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National and international comparisons of instruments are now routinely organized under the auspices of various governing agencies. Arias et al [5] recently presented the final report of the most recent key comparison CCM.G-K1, also called ICAG2009 (International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters), held at the BIPM in Sèvres, France. These comparisons typically include a diverse array of instruments, and any unique characteristic that can cause a bias in the measurement must be explicitly accounted for to produce a valid intercomparison.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%