1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1988.tb02267.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filtration rates of mosquito larvae in suspensions of latex microspheres and yeast cells

Abstract: Filtration rates of fourth instars of Aedes aegypti L., Anopheles albimanus Wiedemann, Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say and Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) were determined by quantifying removal rates of suspended latex microspheres or yeast cells. Average filtration rates were 33–34 μl/larva/h (An. quadrimaculatus), 49–55 (An. albimanus), 490–590 (C. quinquefasciatus) or 590–690 μl/larva/h (Ae. aegypti) for larvae exposed to latex beads suspended in phagostimulant yeast extract solutions. In susp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a fresh weight gain of 1.5 mg larva-' day-' is reported for fourth instars of A.aegypti developing at 28°C (Christophers, 1960), whereas our data extrapolate to daily drinking totals of no more than about 7p1 (=7 mg) per larva per day, assuming the highest drinking rates were maintained, of which only a fraction of a per cent would be dissolved organic material. A comparison between drinking rates reported here and filtration rates of larvae of the same mosquito species determined earlier (Aly, 1988) further stresses the importance of particulate over dissolved food. Mean filtration rates, determined as the volumes of water cleared by larvae of test particles, were 400 times (A.albimanus), 2100 times (A.aegypti) and 3100 times (C. quinquefasciatus) larger than mean drinking rates reported here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…For example, a fresh weight gain of 1.5 mg larva-' day-' is reported for fourth instars of A.aegypti developing at 28°C (Christophers, 1960), whereas our data extrapolate to daily drinking totals of no more than about 7p1 (=7 mg) per larva per day, assuming the highest drinking rates were maintained, of which only a fraction of a per cent would be dissolved organic material. A comparison between drinking rates reported here and filtration rates of larvae of the same mosquito species determined earlier (Aly, 1988) further stresses the importance of particulate over dissolved food. Mean filtration rates, determined as the volumes of water cleared by larvae of test particles, were 400 times (A.albimanus), 2100 times (A.aegypti) and 3100 times (C. quinquefasciatus) larger than mean drinking rates reported here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Finally, CYP9J15 was the only CYP being preferentially transcribed in Malpighian tubules whereas CYP6AL1 was the only gene preferentially transcribed in abdomen carcass. In their breeding sites, Aedes larvae are indiscriminate filter feeders continuously exposed to a wide range of xenobiotics dissolved in water or bound to food particles (Aly, 1988). The preferential transcription of these P450s in the larval alimentary canal might be related to their ability to metabolize xenobiotics present in their environment (Li et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was no surprise to discover that mosquitoes readily ingested MPs. Larvae of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus), Anopheles albimanus Wiedemann, Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say and Culex quinquefasciatus Say have all been shown previously to ingest polystyrene latex beads (Dadd, 1971;Aly, 1988). We show that larvae did not ingest as many of the larger 15 m MPs compared to 2 m MPs which confirms previous work that suggests that filter feeding mosquitoes ingest particles based on their own size (Merritt et al, 1992), This does not infer selection, but probably reflects physical limitations, for example first instar larvae are unable to ingest latex beads as small as 45 µm in diameter (Dadd, 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%