Waterborne Pathogens 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818783-8.00006-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filtration and chemical treatment of waterborne pathogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The supernatant obtained is then typically clarified using membrane filtration to achieve optimal results during large‐volume filtration (Benjamin & Lawler, 2013; Doran, 2012; Todaro, 2014). The membranes have a fixed submicrometer pore structure with a uniform size distribution allowing the retention of particles larger than the maximum pore size of the filter (Sarma, 2020). Several types of membrane‐based processes have been developed for research and industrial purposes such as microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF), reverse osmosis (RO) and electrodialysis (ED), which rely on separating different solutes based on their size (MF, UF, NF), concentration (RO) or charge (ED), respectively (Batt & Tortorello, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supernatant obtained is then typically clarified using membrane filtration to achieve optimal results during large‐volume filtration (Benjamin & Lawler, 2013; Doran, 2012; Todaro, 2014). The membranes have a fixed submicrometer pore structure with a uniform size distribution allowing the retention of particles larger than the maximum pore size of the filter (Sarma, 2020). Several types of membrane‐based processes have been developed for research and industrial purposes such as microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF), reverse osmosis (RO) and electrodialysis (ED), which rely on separating different solutes based on their size (MF, UF, NF), concentration (RO) or charge (ED), respectively (Batt & Tortorello, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the efficacy of the current disinfection methods to control microbial pathogens, the resistance of some pathogenic microorganisms requires high chemical disinfectant dosage with formation of harmful disinfection by-products and even can be present in the user final application (point-of-use water) (Legay et al, 2010;Li et al, 2008;Stoquart et al, 2012). Microbial growth may occur during treatment, distribution, and within plumbing systems of final users with presence of biofilm with increased resistance to disinfection (Sarma, 2020). Waterborne infection can be a great risk at the time and point of supply and outbreaks are periodically reported in water relevant environments like hospitals among others (Blasco et al, 2008;Moore and Walker, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worldwide groundwater is a very common source used for domestic, agricultural and industrial purposes due to its availability, quality and low cost of extraction (Carrard et al, 2019). Groundwater seems to be chemical and pathogenic contaminants free water which is considered as a valuable safe water source for its quality and quantity (Sarma, 2020). However, rapid urbanization, industrialization, advance economic growth, modern agriculture for food security, huge growth of population and climate change issues are changing the groundwater consumption pattern and create unparallel pressure on groundwater source (Assembly, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%