2016
DOI: 10.1177/1461444816634677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites

Abstract: Disagreement persists as to whether social networking sites (SNSs) are used more frequently to facilitate cross-cutting or like-minded discussions. We examine the relationship between the use of SNSs and involvement in discussions with politically similar and dissimilar others among a sample of US Democrats and Republicans. Affective polarization is negatively related to involvement in cross-cutting discussions, suggesting that individuals extend their dislike of the opposing political party to out-party membe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
56
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(45 reference statements)
6
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1073/pnas.1706588114/-/DCSupplemental. correlates with lower polarization (25,26). However, experimental exposure to proattitudinal and counterattitudinal news on Facebook tends to increase polarization (27).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1073/pnas.1706588114/-/DCSupplemental. correlates with lower polarization (25,26). However, experimental exposure to proattitudinal and counterattitudinal news on Facebook tends to increase polarization (27).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to online social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter, which largely translated offline social ties onto online platforms, there is arguable more convergence in the makeup and composition of online and offline social networks (e.g. Brundidge 2010;Eveland, Hutchens, and Morey 2013;Lee et al 2014;Heatherly, Lu, and Lee 2017). Thus, as the adoption and use of social media has become more widespread, they have grown in importance as sources of political information, not only from the news media, but also from personal social ties (Bond et al 2012).…”
Section: Social Media For Political Information Political Disagreemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…so it is adopted by a large number of organizations (Skeels & Grudin., 2009). Similarly, SNSs is also used by employees for connecting with fellow employees (DiMicco et al, 2008), information searching (Ladkin & Buhalis, 2016), problemsolving (Lin, Hou, Wu, & Chang, 2014), discussions (Heatherly, Lu, & Lee, 2017), and information dissemination (Luarn, Yang, & Chiu, 2014) etc. On the other hand, employees are extensively using the SNSs while they are on their job which is affecting their on-the-job performance (Das & Sahoo, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%