2003
DOI: 10.1243/095440803322611705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Film thickness prediction in halftone screen-printing

Abstract: The paper presents a numerical model of image transfer in screen-printing that is supported by experimental data. The model focuses on a roller squeegee system. It combines thin lm hydrodynamic behaviour with roller squeegee deformation and ow through a porous screen. The work within this investigation has, for the rst time, enabled an estimate of deposit thickness at different halftone coverage. For low coverage, ink transfer is governed by hydrodynamic behaviour in the nip contact, and deposited lm thickness… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12 However, squeegee pressure, snap-off distance (the distance between the screen and the substrate) and print speed have not demonstrated consistent trends and have been shown to vary with the rheology of the ink. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Yet, there has only been limited fundamental research to establish the underpinning science of screen printing. The fundamental mechanisms behind this process remain poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 However, squeegee pressure, snap-off distance (the distance between the screen and the substrate) and print speed have not demonstrated consistent trends and have been shown to vary with the rheology of the ink. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Yet, there has only been limited fundamental research to establish the underpinning science of screen printing. The fundamental mechanisms behind this process remain poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, squeegee load has least in uence at the low open area. This is because the squeegee load is reacted to by the impermeable screen, and at the largest open areas the squeegee pressure reacts directly to force more ink through the screen [12]. However, from the parameters investigated, alteration of the squeegee pressure has least effect on density owing to the rigid nature of the roller squeegee, which will therefore have a minimal impact on the prints.…”
Section: Process Parameter Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the change in snapoff with changes in roller diameter leads to an increase in contact between the roller and screen. Also under this circumstance, the hydrodynamic component may become more important, and for a given squeegee load this will result in a thicker lm and consequent increased pumping capacity [12]. …”
Section: Snap-off Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where volumes are large or the printed inks contain abrasive elements, the squeegee condition will vary over its lifetime and a decision must be made when to replace it. Research to date has focused principally on the effect of process settings [9][10][11][12] and no work has been reported to explore squeegee deterioration during printing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%