A Study of the Abrasion of Squeegees Used in Screen Printing and Its Effect on Performance with Application in Printed Electronics

Abstract

This article presents a novel method for accelerated wear of squeegees used in screen printing and describes the development of mechanical tests which allow more in-depth measurement of squeegee properties. In this study, squeegees were abraded on the screen press so that they could be used for subsequent print tests to evaluate the effect of wear on the printed product. Squeegee wear was found to vary between different squeegee types and caused increases in ink transfer and wider printed features. In production this will lead to greater ink consumption, cost per unit and a likelihood of product failure. This also has consequences for the production of functional layers, etc., used in the construction of printed electronics. While more wear generally gave greater increases in ink deposition, the effect of wear differed, depending on the squeegee. There was a correlation between the angle of the squeegee wear and ink film thickness from a worn squeegee. An ability to resist flexing gave a high wear angle and presented a sharper edge at the squeegee/screen interface thus mitigating the effect of wear. There was also a good correlation between resistance to flexing and ink film thickness for unworn squeegees, which was more effective than a comparison based on Shore A hardness. Squeegee indentation at different force levels gave more information than a standard Shore A hardness test and the apparatus used was able to reliably measure reductions in surface hardness due to solvent absorption. Increases in ink deposition gave lower resistance in printed silver lines; however, the correlation between the amount of ink deposited and the resistance, remained the same for all levels of wear, OPEN ACCESSCoatings 2014, 4 357 suggesting that the wear regime designed for this study did not induce detrimental print defects such as line breakages.

Fabric based printed-distributed battery for wearable e-textiles: a review

“…Therefore, viscosity of ink should be adjusted based on the type of fabric to be printed, number of ink droplets, and the printing speed in order to get maximum print quality. Unlike inkjet printing technology, the screen printing is a thick film [ 86 ] deposition technique with capabilities of roll-to-roll manufacturing; thus, applicable for large-scale production. Each printing methods have their own merits and demerits as shown in Table 1 , and also different characteristics in printing, such as cost, pattern resolution and thickness.…”

On-Machine Measurement for Surface Flatness of Transparent and Thin Film in Laser Ablation Process

“…The conventional concept of printed electronics (PEs) comprises the fabrication of circuits and patterns on a thin substrate by injecting conductive ink [1]. PEs have been applied in various devices such as solar cells, batteries, and organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) [2,3]. Roll-to-roll (R2R) is a large-scale PE manufacturing process that continuously prints patterns on a thin film.…”

Improved Manufacturing Performance of Screen Printed Carbon Electrodes through Material Formulation

“…A more volatile solvent also leads to increased viscosity variation and as the process is viscosity dependent [ 10 ], this can lead to variation in print quality. A further solvent effect on process is that the migration of the solvent into the polyurethane squeegee can impact the squeegee properties and hence impact process consistency [ 11 , 12 ]. During material formulation, a compromise must be made between solvent volatility, which is essentially a balance between productivity (which demands low boiling points) versus consistency (which requires a high boiling point).…”