2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Film cooling effectiveness: Comparison of adiabatic and conjugate heat transfer CFD models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
28
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, vane (metal) surface temperature distributions calculated by computer codes using conjugate heat transfer calculations were found to be substantially lower than the predictions using adiabatic wall, refer [14,15]. Similar comparison between the adiabatic and conjugate heat transfer for a fan shaped cooling hole was reported by Silieti et al [16] by using CFD models. Bohn and coworkers [17] conducted a conjugate heat transfer study and computed the effectiveness values using the adiabatic condition.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…For example, vane (metal) surface temperature distributions calculated by computer codes using conjugate heat transfer calculations were found to be substantially lower than the predictions using adiabatic wall, refer [14,15]. Similar comparison between the adiabatic and conjugate heat transfer for a fan shaped cooling hole was reported by Silieti et al [16] by using CFD models. Bohn and coworkers [17] conducted a conjugate heat transfer study and computed the effectiveness values using the adiabatic condition.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The conventional analysis techniques on film cooling effectiveness which neglect the conjugate heat transfer (CHT) effects were questioned by Harrison and Bogard [9,10]. In the numerical study of Silieti et al [11] on the end wall film effectiveness, a better agreement with the experimental data was achieved by using the conjugate model in comparison with the results with an adiabatic model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted from a study by Silieti et al [24], modelling the conductive transfer of heat in the plate is essential to properly capture the heating of the fl uid inside each cooling hole; this will inevitably have an effect on the heat transfer coeffi cient and temperature of the combustor wall and thus how accurately the cooling effectiveness over the combustor wall can be modelled. With this in mind, a CHT approach is adopted to account for heat transfer via plate conduction as well as fl uid convection.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%