2017
DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1298147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filling the gap in the European administrative space: the role of administrative networks in EU implementation and enforcement

Abstract: European administrative networks (EANs) are a key building block of the European Administrative Space (EAS). Crucially, they are to fill the gap between the EU's policy ambitions and its limited administrative capacities. Whereas ample research has been done on policy preparation networks, the role of implementing EANs has received less attention in the EAS literature. This article fills this gap by providing a systematic review of relevant insights in four adjacent literatures: EU governance; international re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Administrative networks are therefore established to fill the gaps between the EU's policy targets and its limited administrative capacity. 17 What makes a specific type of governance a "network" is usually its informal nature, although trans-disciplinary literature offers plenty of definitions for networked governance. 18 Whatever task the network is called to conduct (decisional, regulatory, enforcing and so on), the choice to do it through a network is therefore due to a functional approach, namely one aimed at helping all network participants to benefit from sharing their functions with other actors.…”
Section: The Concept Of Networked Enforcement and Its Meritsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Administrative networks are therefore established to fill the gaps between the EU's policy targets and its limited administrative capacity. 17 What makes a specific type of governance a "network" is usually its informal nature, although trans-disciplinary literature offers plenty of definitions for networked governance. 18 Whatever task the network is called to conduct (decisional, regulatory, enforcing and so on), the choice to do it through a network is therefore due to a functional approach, namely one aimed at helping all network participants to benefit from sharing their functions with other actors.…”
Section: The Concept Of Networked Enforcement and Its Meritsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hierbij zal ik specifiek inzoomen op Europese overheidsnetwerken: netwerken van nationale overheidsorganisaties, gericht op het bevorderen van de nationale implementatie van Europese regelgeving. De gedachte is dat de nationale leden van dit soort netwerken van elkaar kunnen leren en door elkaar overtuigd of zelfs gedwongen zullen worden tot betere implementatie (Mastenbroek & Sindbjerg Martinsen, 2018). Deze overheidsnetwerken, actief op vrijwel alle beleidsterreinen (Levi-Faur, 2011, pp.…”
Section: Eigen Evaluatieonderzoekunclassified
“…The literature on the new modes of information sharing and partnership has focused on coordination (Galetta, Hofmann & Schneider, 2014;Vifell & Sjögren, 2014;Hartlapp & Heidbreder, 2017;Mastenbroek & Martinsen, 2017), monitoring (Levi-Faur, 2011Benz, Corcaci & Doser, 2016), enforcement and partnerships as specific policy implementation tools at the EU level. These studies analyse the socialisation process that the national agencies undergo when these instruments are introduced.…”
Section: Explaining Administrative Coordinatation -Information Exchanmentioning
confidence: 99%