File System Performance Comparison in Full Hardware Virtualization with ESXi, KVM, Hyper-V and Xen Hypervisors

Djordjevic, Borislav; Timčenko, Valentina; Kraljević, Nenad; Maček, Nemanja

doi:10.4316/aece.2021.01002

Cited by 14 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While Oracle VM Virual Box and VMware Workstation are examples of Type-II hypervisor. Practically, Type-I hypervisors are better choice than Type-II in terms of performance [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Comparison of Xen AND Hyper-V in Cloud Computing While Using Cryptosystems

Abdulraheem¹

2022

ijasca

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cloud computing is internet-distributed computing model transferring processes from personal computers or servers to cloud servers. Nowadays, security and performance of cloud computing is considered challenging for both users and cloud service providers. Securing data on cloud computing servers will ensures privacy, confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Using cryptographic techniques is one of the major methods to ensure the data security while storing and transmission. Hypervisor in a cloud is a software that provides abstraction and called virtual machine monitor. Hyper-V and Xen are two different types of hypervisors. In this paper, eight different types of cryptographic algorithms are deployed by using the two hypervisors with instances, to measure the hypervisors performance while encryption and decryption. CPU utilization and response time are measured while encryption and decryption are having different data types and sizes. Results show that Xen is better than Hyper-V in most results on average at 15% and 6.1% for time duration and CPU utilization respectively. Keywords: Cloud Computing, Virtualization, Hypervisors, Xen, Hyper-V, Cryptographic Algorithm

show abstract

“…While Oracle VM Virual Box and VMware Workstation are examples of Type-II hypervisor. Practically, Type-I hypervisors are better choice than Type-II in terms of performance [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Comparison of Xen AND Hyper-V in Cloud Computing While Using Cryptosystems

Abdulraheem¹

2022

ijasca

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• In hardware virtualization, virtual and physical hardware are matched through a hypervisor, which enables an operating system to be run in a virtual hardware environment [4]- [6]. Consequently, one server can run multiple virtual machines (VMs), with each device executing a different operating system and software.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Analysis in HyperFlex and vSAN Hyper Convergence Platforms for Online Course Consideration

Tsung

Liu

et al. 2022

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the ubiquity of high-speed networks and cloud technologies, hyper-convergence (HC) has become commonplace and satisfies flex allocation requirements. This study compared the VMware virtual storage area network (vSAN), which has the largest market share, with Cisco HyperFlex, released by Cisco for high-level network applications, to assess the performance of various HC technologies in running virtual machines in most virtualized environments. The experiments consider the benchmark (HCIBench) to evaluate the platform's performance. The benchmark provides objective performance scores. Thus, the performance results derived by HCIBench could be applied to discuss the appropriate scenarios for both VMware vSAN and Cisco HyperFlex. The experiments simulate common application scenarios to discover good HC platforms for real-world requirements. The VMware vSAN demonstrated more robust overall performance (about 38.18% and 22.72% improvement for IOPS and transmission speed, respectively), the HyperFlex Data Platform provided better performance wrote latency (about 20.32% improvement) when few virtual machines were used, and the write load was heavy. The difference in CPU usage between the two platforms is not too much (about 2.565%). The vSAN is recommended for general purposes, while HyperFlex performs better in areas with high write requirements (such as the data center).

show abstract

“…QEMU emulates the processor and a long list of peripheral devices, such as disk, network, VGA, PCI, USB, serial / parallel ports, and so on, to build a complete piece of virtual hardware on which the guest operating system can be installed (DJORDJEVIC et al, 2021). This emulation is provided by KVM.…”

Section: Kernel-based Virtual Machinementioning

confidence: 99%

“…QEMU is a free piece of software and mainly licensed under GNU's General Public License (GPL) (DJORDJEVIC et al, 2021). QEMU is a generic and open source machine emulator and virtualizer.…”

Section: Qemumentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

GARNET: An Edge Virtualized Everything Function Management Architecture

Cunha¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agradeço primeiramente a Jeová Deus, por estar ao meu lado, ter me apoiado e consolado, e em especial, nos momentos mais difíceis da minha vida. Se consegui chegar até aqui, e ser o que sou, nunca foi por força própria, mas pela força ativa de Jeová Deus, seu espírito santo.Agradeço a minha mãe, Cleusdete Maria de Oliveira, e ao meu pai, Jair Pinto da Cunha Júnior, que sempre me amaram, me apoiaram, e se esforçaram tanto para me dar uma vida digna e a oportunidade de estudar que eles não puderam ter. Espero que possa retribuir-lhes por todo carinho e amor que eles têm por mim. Espero muito um dia, poder fazer muito mais por eles do que eles fizeram por mim. Vocês são as pessoas mais importantes da minha vida! Ao Prof. Dr. Flávio de Oliveira Silva, pela orientação na condução deste trabalho, pela confiança, pelos conselhos em momentos que me sentia perdido, pela motivação quando queria desistir, pela compreensão quando queria fazer diferente e principalmente, pela parceria em todos os momentos dessa jornada.A todos meus colegas da UFU, em especial ao Rodrigo Moreira e Diego Nunes Molinos que por entre conversas do corredor, puderam me acalmar e me ajudar a entender quem eu sou, onde me encontrava, e por onde poderia caminhar.A BRF S.A, a todos seus funcionários, direção e administração cujo propósito é o de uma vida melhor para a sociedade, baseado em segurança, excelência e integridade, qualidades estas que me motiva a olhar para o futuro e ser alguém melhor todos os dias.Aos professores do Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência da Computação da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) por partilharem experiências e conhecimentos.A Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, seu corpo docente, direção e administração que proporcionaram um novo caminho, baseado em confiança, mérito e ética, qualidades estas presentes na instituição.

show abstract

File System Performance Comparison in Full Hardware Virtualization with ESXi, KVM, Hyper-V and Xen Hypervisors

Cited by 14 publications

References 6 publications

Performance Comparison of Xen AND Hyper-V in Cloud Computing While Using Cryptosystems

Performance Comparison of Xen AND Hyper-V in Cloud Computing While Using Cryptosystems

Performance Analysis in HyperFlex and vSAN Hyper Convergence Platforms for Online Course Consideration

GARNET: An Edge Virtualized Everything Function Management Architecture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About