Fifty Years of<i>Representative and Responsible Government:</i>Contemporary Relevance, Theoretical Revisions and Conceptual Reflection

Flinders, Matthew; Judge, David

doi:10.1080/00344893.2017.1341078

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Metagovernance, according to Bevir (, p. 31), refers to the ‘governance of governance’. It is also about the style and manner of governing that focuses on how governmental institutions ‘set the ground rules and parameters within which network governance emerges and operates’ (Flinders and Judge, , p.9). Flinders and Judge (, p.9) suggest, rightly, that the ultimate test or ‘display’ of the capacity for metagovernance is ‘revealed when governments respond to specific crises or failures by pulling functions, powers and responsibilities back into governmental structures’.…”

Section: Global Governance and The Politics Of Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is also about the style and manner of governing that focuses on how governmental institutions ‘set the ground rules and parameters within which network governance emerges and operates’ (Flinders and Judge, , p.9). Flinders and Judge (, p.9) suggest, rightly, that the ultimate test or ‘display’ of the capacity for metagovernance is ‘revealed when governments respond to specific crises or failures by pulling functions, powers and responsibilities back into governmental structures’. Crucially, for One Health, what we have seen to date is a lack of ‘metagoverning’ on global health security governance and the 2014 Ebola crisis response is a strong indicator of institutional deficits in executing cohesive and cross‐sectoral crisis management.…”

Section: Global Governance and The Politics Of Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Governing Towards ‘One Health’: Establishing Knowledge Integration in Global Health Security Governance

Connolly

2017

Global Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent global threats (e.g. Ebola, avian influenza, the Zika virus) have demonstrated the need for policy makers to focus on the detection of risks at the animal‐human interface. Yet epistemic knowledge across these domains is not sufficiently joined‐up. The article argues that, despite some progress, in order for the policy agenda for global health security to develop towards a ‘One Health’ model there is a need for integration across public and animal health domains. This article sets out an evaluation framework for establishing knowledge integration across these sectors. The article concludes that although ‘One Health may seem utopian, given there are key challenges when it comes to reaching integration, there are important steps that can be taken the short to medium‐term. These include reforms to education and training programmes and interdisciplinary research collaborations. A key determinant of whether One Health becomes a paradigm which frames public policy, and leads to policy and institutional changes to enable public value creation and sustainability, is the presence of an ‘epistemic community’ that bridges health networks.

show abstract

Section: Global Governance and The Politics Of Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Global Governance and The Politics Of Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%