Fifty Key Thinkers on History

Hughes‐Warrington, Marnie

doi:10.4324/9780203019177

Cited by 10 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We rely on the methodological principles of objectivity, historicism, determinism, alternativeness, reconstruction, developed in the theoretical studies by the following scientists: Charles-Victor Langlois, Charles Seignobos [17]; Robin George Collingwood [5]; Marc Léopold Benjamin Bloch [4]; Peter Lambert and Phillipp Schofield [18]; Abrams Lynn [1]; Brundage Anthony [3]; Gregory Ian, Ell Paul [6]; Hughes-Warrington [9]; Iggers George, Wang Qiang Edward [10]; Akira Iriye [11] [40, p105-107]. The letter had hitherto been considered as a single letter.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

«persian Project» – One Part Erekle’s Safe Caucasus Model

Natsvaladze¹

2021

Education and Science of Today: Intersectoral Issues and Development of Sciences Volume4

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After Agha Mohammad Khan brought Tbilisi to earth in 1795, the king Erekle the Second sent his ambassadors to the Austrian Emperor in Vienna proposing to them the Georgian version of Christian globalization once again. This was the topic that the Emperor of Austria Joseph the Second as well as that of the Holy Roman Empire had been interested in for years. This plan by the king Erekle actually repeated the conceptual model that Capuchin monks Domenique and Mauro Veronelli were supposed to convey to Joseph the Second in 1781-82 if they were not assassinated on their way to him. The King of Kartli and Kakheti proposed to Catherine the Second and Joseph the Second that they give consideration to the Persian Project when dividing Europe according to the Greek Project, as the safe Caucasia model would gain special reliability to the concept of Christian globalization. The tragic events of 1795, the destruction of Tbilisi by Agha Mohammad Khan once again evidenced the high level of necessity of the Persian Project not only for Georgia but for safety of Europe as well. It was for this very reason that the King Erekle once again attempted to find the solution in Europe. The project was realistic within the framework of the single Christian globalization model and with consideration of the international situation of the 80-s of the XVIII century, but the project implementation was obstructed by Russia itself, as it would not abandon its imperial ambitions and preferred conquering the Georgian Kingdoms instead of partnering them and exercising good will toward them.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

«persian Project» – One Part Erekle’s Safe Caucasus Model

Natsvaladze¹

2021

Education and Science of Today: Intersectoral Issues and Development of Sciences Volume4

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We rely on the methodological principles of objectivity, historicism, determinism, alternativeness, reconstruction, developed in the theoretical studies by the following scientists: Charles-Victor Langlois, Charles Seignobos; Robin George Collingwood [6]; Marc Léopold Benjamin Bloch [5]; Peter Lambert and Phillipp Schofield [27]; Abrams Lynn [1]; Brundage Anthony [4]; Gregory Ian, Ell Paul [11]; Hughes-Warrington [14]; Iggers George, Wang Qiang Edward [16]; Akira Iriye [17] [61, p 402-404; 62], afterwards invaluable epistolary material was found in the archives of the Vatican, Vienna, Venice by Ilia Tabaghua, who attached these documents to a monograph published in 1979 [63].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Caucasian Gambit of World Empires and Erekle Ii

Natsvaladze¹

2021

Theoretical and Empirical Scientific Research: Concept and Trends Volume2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current study is the first attempt to study the relations between Russian-Georgian relations within the context of international political processes, in particular, the Seven Years' War and the plan for the redistribution of Europe, the "Greek Project". The world historical process of the second half of the XVIII century is of special importance for the proper assessment of the history of Georgia. Russian and Soviet historiography deliberately distorted the facts and events of the time leading to the improper assessment of the annexation of Georgia and the Caucasus. The European contacts of King Erekle II of Kartli-Kakheti were deliberately erased, and hence the Caucasus was declared a geostrategic space on Russian orbit and was artificially separated from the world historical processes. Therefore, a violent political act, the conquest of Georgia was disguised as an alliance corresponding with the idea of Christian common faith. The article analyzes the reasons the members of the European system of international relations did not like the existence of a powerful state in the Caucasus. The strategic policy directions of the Austrian Empire were also analyzed, making it obvious once again that the only ally of Erekle II was the Emperor of Austria.

show abstract

“…Whereas in the 1950s and 1960s Namier was held up in Britain and continental Europe as an exemplar of the craft of history writing, and even as late as the 1990s no general account of historiography was complete without a chapter on Namier, 45 by 2008 an account of 'fifty key thinkers of history' could safely omit him. 46 Today it is Namier's occasional pieces, reviews and essays which are more frequently read and quoted than the books to which he dedicated so much of his life. He is celebrated as a prose stylist and quoted as an aphorist, while his eighteenth-century work is relegated to a back shelf.…”

Section: Rewriting the Eighteenth Centurymentioning

confidence: 99%

Vanished supremacies

Hayton¹

2019

Conservative Revolutionary

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fifty Key Thinkers on History

Cited by 10 publications

References 0 publications

«persian Project» – One Part Erekle’s Safe Caucasus Model

«persian Project» – One Part Erekle’s Safe Caucasus Model

The Caucasian Gambit of World Empires and Erekle Ii

Vanished supremacies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About