2017
DOI: 10.1080/15700763.2016.1270334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fifteen Years of Publication:Leadership and Policy in Schoolsand Its Scholarly Contribution Since Its Foundation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sources from the field of school leadership were consulted in formulating a review framework and a methodological approach (Ärlestig et al, 2016;Bush and Crawford, 2012;Hallinger, 2013;Oplatka, 2017). Adopting a systematic review and thematic synthesis (Cherry et al, 2017) ensured accurate synthesis of "the relevant literature in a comprehensive, transparent and objective manner" (Byrne, 2016, p. 1).…”
Section: Review Framework and Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sources from the field of school leadership were consulted in formulating a review framework and a methodological approach (Ärlestig et al, 2016;Bush and Crawford, 2012;Hallinger, 2013;Oplatka, 2017). Adopting a systematic review and thematic synthesis (Cherry et al, 2017) ensured accurate synthesis of "the relevant literature in a comprehensive, transparent and objective manner" (Byrne, 2016, p. 1).…”
Section: Review Framework and Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) religious influence on school leadership. Oplatka's (2017) typology. However, as Oplatka (2017, p. 7) states, while overviewing the research methods used in research reviewed gives a snapshot of the methods used, it is also somewhat arbitrary given that "categories themselves are not mutually exclusive".…”
Section: Findings and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitel çalışmalarda ise durum çalışmasına ağırlık verilmiştir. Nitekim Türkiye'de yetişkin eğitimi (Yıldız, 2004), hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitimi (Yücel -Toy, 2015), çok kültürlü eğitim (Günay ve Aydın, 2015), çevre eğitimi (Kahyaoğlu, 2016), fen ve matematik eğitimi (Gül ve Sözbilir, 2015), proje tabanlı öğrenme (Ayaz ve Söylemez, 2015), eğitimde teknoloji kullanımının sürdürebilirliği (Dağhan ve Akkoyunlu, 2015) ve program değerlendirme (Kurt ve Erdoğan, 2015), okuma becerisi (Akaydın ve Çeçen, 2015), eğitim bilimleri tezleri (Karadağ, 2010), okullarda liderlik (Oplatka, 2017) konularında yapılan tematik içerik analizi araştırmalarında nicel yöntemin yoğun olarak kullanıldığını saptamışlardır. Bu durum nicel araştırma yöntemi sonuçlarının genellenebilir bir nitelik taşımasından kaynaklanıyor olabilir.…”
Section: Tartışma Sonuç Ve öNerilerunclassified