2016
DOI: 10.1186/s10194-016-0678-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field testing of the ICHD-3β and expert opinion criteria for chronic migraine

Abstract: BackgroundChronic headache (CrH) occurs commonly in the population, and chronic migraine (CM) accounts for much of the CrH. Diagnostic criteria for CM remain controversial, and this could lead to undertreatment of CM. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical profiles of CM and to field test the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3β criteria (ICHD-3β) and Expert Opinion criteria (EO) for CM application.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of CrH patients in our hea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chronic migraineurs were not categorized out from whole migraineurs due to small case number(4 with chronic migraine and 26 with episodic migraine). The ICHD-3β criteria for chronic migraine diagnosis required headache at least 15 days/month for least 3 months, it was restrictive to include enough chronic migraineurs compared with Expert Opinion criteria published in 2014 [52]. Fourth, the seed used in this study covered the whole RN and SN; however, the RN was subdivided into the large and small cell portions, and the SN was subdivided into the dorsal pars compacta and pars reticulata.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chronic migraineurs were not categorized out from whole migraineurs due to small case number(4 with chronic migraine and 26 with episodic migraine). The ICHD-3β criteria for chronic migraine diagnosis required headache at least 15 days/month for least 3 months, it was restrictive to include enough chronic migraineurs compared with Expert Opinion criteria published in 2014 [52]. Fourth, the seed used in this study covered the whole RN and SN; however, the RN was subdivided into the large and small cell portions, and the SN was subdivided into the dorsal pars compacta and pars reticulata.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each patient completed a semistructured questionnaire under the guidance of a neurologist. The questionnaire consisted of three parts: the rst part obtained information on demographics (personal situation and family history); the second part obtained information on migraine, including the age of onset, course of migraine, triggers, duration of headache (divided into four stages: <1 hour, 1-24 hours, 24-72 hours, > 72 hours), frequency of attacks (days of attacks per month), intensity of pain on a 1-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS), accompanying symptoms and the use of acute medication; and the third part obtained information on vestibular symptoms, including the age of onset, course, frequency of attacks, and temporal relationship with headache attacks (three answers: always, sometimes, never) (11,12). The patients were divided into three groups: the episodic migraine group (EM), chronic migraine group (CM) and tension-type headache group (TTH).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been different case definitions of chronic migraine over the last couple of decades and as these defini-Schembri, et al tions have evolved, so has the epidemiology of migraine evolved. However, the diagnostic criteria for chronic migraine remain controversial [25]. The term chronic migraine is itself considered to be ambiguous, and the demarcation between the definition of chronic migraine and that of episodic migraine is deemed arbitrary.…”
Section: Controversy Surrounding Chronic Migraine and Medication Overuse Headachementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International Classification of Headache Disorders-2-revised allowed a higher proportion of subjects to be correctly diagnosed with medication overuse headache [ 21 ], possibly increasing its prevalence rates in epidemiological studies. However, difficulty was still found when applying the criteria in patients with medication overuse headache [ 25 ]. Many patients with more than 15 days of headache per month were likely to take analgesia for more than ten days per month, and medication overuse headache was seen as a separate diagnosis and precluded a diagnosis of chronic migraine.…”
Section: Main Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%