2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field suppression of the peachtree borer, Synanthedon exitiosa, using Steinernema carpocapsae: Effects of irrigation, a sprayable gel and application method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the above, certain studies did not detect EPN efficacy differences when comparing application equipment, e.g., when targeting codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), using a lance applicator versus an airblast sprayer (Lacey, Arthurs, Unruh, Headrick, & Fritts, 2006) or targeting the peachtree borer, Synanthedon exitiosa (Say) (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) using a trunk sprayer, handgun or boom sprayer (Shapiro-Ilan, Cottrell, Mizell, Horton, & Zaid, 2015). The trunk sprayer is an attractive approach because the equipment uses smart technology to only spray when passing a trunk, thereby reducing waste of nematodes (or other product) between trees ( Fig.…”
Section: A Comparison Of Application Equipment and Associated Parametersmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the above, certain studies did not detect EPN efficacy differences when comparing application equipment, e.g., when targeting codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), using a lance applicator versus an airblast sprayer (Lacey, Arthurs, Unruh, Headrick, & Fritts, 2006) or targeting the peachtree borer, Synanthedon exitiosa (Say) (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) using a trunk sprayer, handgun or boom sprayer (Shapiro-Ilan, Cottrell, Mizell, Horton, & Zaid, 2015). The trunk sprayer is an attractive approach because the equipment uses smart technology to only spray when passing a trunk, thereby reducing waste of nematodes (or other product) between trees ( Fig.…”
Section: A Comparison Of Application Equipment and Associated Parametersmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Applications of S. carpocapsae for control of S. pictipes, were greatly enhanced by a follow-up application of a sprayable gel (the gel is commonly used for protecting structures from fire) (Shapiro-Ilan et al). Recently, the gel was also shown to be useful when tank-mixed directly with the nematodes at a lower concentration (<2 % prevents nozzle clogging) and the gel can also be applied to the soil surface during ground applications to protect EPNs from UV radiation and desiccation (in lieu of irrigation) (Shapiro-Ilan et al, 2015) (Fig. 9.2).…”
Section: Improved Methods Of Applicationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast to the above, certain studies did not detect EPN efficacy differences when comparing application equipment, e.g., when targeting codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), using a lance applicator versus an airblast sprayer or targeting the peachtree borer, Synanthedon exitiosa (Say) (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) using a trunk sprayer, handgun or boom sprayer (Shapiro-Ilan, Cottrell, Mizell, Horton, & Zaid, 2015). The trunk sprayer is an attractive approach because the equipment uses smart technology to only spray when passing a trunk, thereby reducing waste of nematodes (or other product) between trees ( Fig.…”
Section: A Comparison Of Application Equipment and Associated Parametersmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, there are many factors that affect their survival time: sedimentation, high oxygen demand, decreased response of some species at low temperatures, susceptibility to microbial contamination, special storage conditions and appropriate concentration for each species (Grewal & Peters 2005). Also, the refrigeration requirements increase costs, hinder the transport (Grewal 2002) and involve the use of application equipment with specific requirements (Toepfer et al 2010;Brusselman et al 2012;Lacey & Georgis 2012;Beck et al 2014;Shapiro-Ilan et al 2015).…”
Section: Formulations For Storage and Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%