1989
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1989.241.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Performance of in Vitro-Propagated 'Northblue' Blueberries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Vários autores comprovaram, em campo, que mudas de mirtilo propagadas in vitro apresentam maior número de brotações do que as propagadas por estaquia (Read et al, 1989;Jamieson & Nickerson, 2003;Litwinczuk et al, 2005). A emissão de maior número de brotações oriundas do colo da planta possibilita renovação das hastes produtivas, já que o mirtilo apresenta hábito basitônico, ou seja, suas brotações surgem da base da planta.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Vários autores comprovaram, em campo, que mudas de mirtilo propagadas in vitro apresentam maior número de brotações do que as propagadas por estaquia (Read et al, 1989;Jamieson & Nickerson, 2003;Litwinczuk et al, 2005). A emissão de maior número de brotações oriundas do colo da planta possibilita renovação das hastes produtivas, já que o mirtilo apresenta hábito basitônico, ou seja, suas brotações surgem da base da planta.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…A cultivar Bluegem foi a de menor diâmetro. As cultivares Bluegem e Woodard se destacaram quanto à produção por planta e por área, tendo atingido valores tidos como adequados (Read et al, 1989), considerando-se que esta foi a primeira colheita. Os menores índices de produtividade para 'Briteblue' se devem a problemas de ordem fitossanitária, como a seca dos ramos ("stem blight"), causada por Botryosphaeria spp.. Antunes et al (2008) constataram produção de 1,5, 1,63 e 0,67 kg por planta, respectivamente, para as cultivares Bluegem, Briteblue e Woodard, oriundas de estaquia.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a field trial, Dweikat and Lyrene (1988) found no off-types among young blueberry (V. corymbosum × V. Elliottii) plants obtained from adventitious shoots but this study did not evaluate fruit characteristics as the examined plants were only several months old. Although Grout et al (1986) reported more basal branches and lateral shoots on micropropagated plants of highbush blueberry than on those propagated by stem cuttings, and Read et al (1988) obtained more flower buds and higher yields on micropropagated highbush blueberry cultivars, micropropagated lowbush blueberries produced fewer flower buds than did conventionally propagated plants (Jamieson and Nickerson 2003). Softwood cutting-derived Herbert highbush blueberry plants grew more slowly and produced less and shorter shoots than did micropropagated plants, although majority of the cutting-propagated plants developed flowers more abundantly and earlier, and bore larger berries than did the plants from tissue culture (Litwińczuk et al 2005).…”
Section: Growth and Development Of Micropropagated Plantsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Micropropagation is nowadays the most popular method being the most efficient relative to other techniques, and providing healthy and uniform planting material. The supportes of this method are convinced that blueberry shrubs from the in vitro cultures grow more vigorously [Read et al 1989, ElShiekh et al 1996. There are as well the oponents who think that even if initialy shrubs grow strong they start cropping later and their fruits are smaller as compared to the traditionally propagated plants [Litwińczuk et al 2005, Ostrolucká et al 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%