2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.94.052209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field measurement analysis to validate lane-changing behavior in a cellular automaton model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lth layer is recorded as L l , and the input layer is L 1 and the output layer is L n l . There is (W, b) = (W (1) , b (1) , W (2) , b (2) ) as parameters in the above neural network, W (l) i,j is the connection parameter between unit j in layer l and unit i in layer…”
Section: The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lth layer is recorded as L l , and the input layer is L 1 and the output layer is L n l . There is (W, b) = (W (1) , b (1) , W (2) , b (2) ) as parameters in the above neural network, W (l) i,j is the connection parameter between unit j in layer l and unit i in layer…”
Section: The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TSV data can be used to extract massive amounts of meaningful traffic information including traffic density, average velocity of vehicles, traffic flux, lane-changing rate and other various statistical properties for traffic flow. In fact, there are some pioneer studies [2,3] that obtain those properties from traffic videos, which can be applied to validate mathematical models of traffic flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STCA model can well describe lane-changing process with simple evolution rules. Using cellular automata model, the asymmetric lanechanging behavior between the fast lane and the slow lane and effects of lane-changing rules on multilane highway traffic were discussed, respectively [8,9].…”
Section: Lane-changing Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The car-following model assumes a lead vehicle followed by a subsequent one within a designated single lane, maintaining a minimum space and time gap between them [ [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] ]. To better mimic actual traffic flow, several improved car-following model variants have been proposed, including gas kinetic, hydrodynamic lattice, optimum velocity (OV), generalized force (GF), and full velocity difference (FVD) models [ [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%