We assessed the acceptability and operational suitability of a rapid point-of-care syphilis test and identifi ed barriers to testing among high-risk groups and healthcare professionals in a sexually transmitted infections clinic in Manaus, Brazil. Use of this test could considerably alleviate the impact of syphilis in hard-to-reach populations in the Amazon region of Brazil.T he new generation of rapid point-of-care (POC) syphilis diagnostic tests has shown good reliability and can be performed in any clinical setting. These tests can provide fast results during a patient's initial visit (1).Implementation of syphilis screening programs can be hampered by operational and technical diffi culties (2-4) such as inadequate training, poor supervision, inconsistent quality control, disruptions in receiving medical supplies, and erratic electricity or refrigeration facilities needed to perform the test or store its reagents (5). Patients' barriers to testing are often structural (accessibility and clinic hours) or fi nancial (4). Further, test-seeking behavior can be negatively affected by the silent nature of the infection, the patient's limited syphilis-related knowledge, and the perceived quality of healthcare provided. Overcoming any of these barriers would result in increased accessibility of services to those most in need and effective implementation of testing within often fragile healthcare systems located in resource-limited countries.
The StudyThe study was undertaken within a larger fi eld evaluation of a novel POC test for the detection of treponemal antibodies (VisiTect Syphilis, Omega Diagnostics, Alloa, Scotland) ( Figure 1) in a sexually transmitted infections clinic located in a "red-light" area near the harbor of Manaus, Brazil (6). Before the evaluation, all staff were trained in the use of the test. One month after the start of syphilis screening, 10 clinical staff and 2 laboratory technicians were interviewed to identify factors that facilitated or impeded performance of the test.Over a 6-week period, 60 patients, who had given informed oral consent, were interviewed while awaiting test results. The questionnaire was designed to examine reasons and potential barriers for syphilis testing, participant satisfaction with the information and attention received, and syphilis knowledge.A separate subsample of consecutive patients, who were not interviewed, participated in a time-fl ow analysis. At all stages of the consultation, staff recorded, on forms given to the patient, the exact start and fi nish time of contact with the patient and the number of minutes required to perform each task with the patient (Figure 2). Time difference between tasks is the waiting time.Descriptive analysis of quantitative data was done by using STATA version 9.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Detailed notes on qualitative items were analyzed thematically, coded, and categorized according to underlying themes included in the questionnaire. Categorized information was classifi ed into 5 themes (confi dence in test re...