2015
DOI: 10.1186/s40813-015-0006-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field efficacy study of a novel ready-to-use vaccine against mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus type 2 in a Greek farm

Abstract: BackgroundThe primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy, under field conditions, of a novel ready-to use Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (M hyo) and Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) combination vaccine given to piglets as one vaccination (1-shot) at 3 weeks of age. The study was carried out according to a controlled, randomised, and blinded design in a Greek pig herd with clinical M. hyo and subclinical PCV2 infection. Moreover, based on serology at the time of vaccination, the average PCV2 titre was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of this study are in agreement with previous findings regarding the efficacy of the combination vaccine in the face of average PCV2 MDI levels (9.38 log 2 ) [25]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of this study are in agreement with previous findings regarding the efficacy of the combination vaccine in the face of average PCV2 MDI levels (9.38 log 2 ) [25]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…On the contrary, control animals had a weaker humoral response. Similar immune response of piglets against natural M. hyo infection after administration of the combination vaccine has been previously reported [25]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…From these papers, 10 were excluded based on in-/exclusion criteria. Accordingly, 13 articles [ 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ] were finally considered for data collection ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, some researchers have demonstrated that co-infection with Mhp and PRRSV show no potentiating effect (Van Alstine, Stevenson, & Kanitz, 1996). Thacker and colleagues suggested that the Mhp potentiated and prolonged PRRSV-induced pneumonia clinically, macroscopically and microscopically regardless of the inoculation sequence of infection to both pathogens, whereas PRRSV did not aggravate Mhp infection in piglets when inoculated before Mhp under experimental conditions (Thacker, Halbur, Ross, Thanawongnuwech, & Thacker, 1999;Tzika et al, 2015;Van Alstine et al, 1996). Furthermore, Fablet suggested that, the infection by Mhp was associated with PRRSV seropositive status (Fablet, Marois-Crehan, Grasland, Simon, & Rose, 2016a).…”
Section: Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%