2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10393-018-1384-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Diagnostics and Seasonality of Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola in Wild Snake Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
43
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that in EIS, the negative predictive value of skin lesions in identifying apparent ophidiomycosis was 100%. Conversely, the positive predictive value is poor, making it difficult to use clinical signs to confirm a diagnosis of apparent ophidiomycosis [53]. This is consistent with previous literature that showed the rate of false negatives is nearly 10 times higher in animals without lesions than individuals with lesions [48].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It is interesting to note that in EIS, the negative predictive value of skin lesions in identifying apparent ophidiomycosis was 100%. Conversely, the positive predictive value is poor, making it difficult to use clinical signs to confirm a diagnosis of apparent ophidiomycosis [53]. This is consistent with previous literature that showed the rate of false negatives is nearly 10 times higher in animals without lesions than individuals with lesions [48].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In eastern indigo snakes alone, 83.2% of snakes had skin lesions and 43.9% of snakes tested qPCR positive 15 . Previous state-wide studies found a 12.7% prevalence of skin lesions in eastern massasauga rattlesnakes in Michigan 16 , a 51.7% prevalence of lesions in snakes in Kentucky 18 , and a 30.0% prevalence of qPCR positive snakes in Tennessee 22 . However, the prevalence of disease in eastern massasaugas in Michigan was found to vary significantly across time and space, with the prevalence of lesions varying from 0 to 61.1% and the prevalence of positive qPCR results varying from 0 to 13.3% 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…While informative, these studies do not provide data regarding the overall epidemiology of the disease, including the impacts of geographic, temporal, and phylogenetic factors. Such broad examinations of disease distribution are crucial for informing management decisions that may mitigate the effects of ophidiomycosis on species of conservation concern and all snake populations worldwide 18 . Previous published reports of the disease in wild-caught snakes in the state of Georgia are rare, but include a black rat snake (Pantherophis obsoletus) with swelling around the right eye 19 , a mud snake (Farancia abacura) with head swelling and dysecdysis 20 , and populations of eastern indigo snakes (Drymarchon couperi), which are a species of conservation concern 15 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…North American crotalids and Nerodia species have previously been shown to have a high prevalence of ophidiomycosis and may be uniquely sensitive to infection due to their environment ( Nerodia ) or morphology (pits in crotalids) [ 24 , 28 , 39 , 53 ]. Recent studies in aquatic snakes in Kentucky have highlighted that aquatic snake susceptibility is under-represented in the literature and warrants careful investigation [ 39 ]. It is possible that the perceived increase in susceptibility of crotalids represents a sampling bias in which more crotalids are sampled historically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%