1978
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Dependence and Hemispheric Specialization

Abstract: It has been suggested that field dependence arises out of deficit in left hemisphere function. There are numerous difficulties encountered in the interpretation of the research leading to this proposition. Problems in the establishment of such cause-effect relationships are outlined, and some future avenues for research are suggested.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant differences in support of their hypothesis (i.e., as a function of location of lesion) were found only in the case of the tactile tests. Garrick (1978) supported Pizzamiglio and Carli's interpretation, pointing out certain similarities between field independence and functions traditionally attributed to the right hemisphere (concept formation, creativity, management of spatial information, etc.). This author also criticized the conclusions reached by Berent and his coworkers, citing studies in which verbal paired-associate tasks had been equated with imaginative processes related to the right hemisphere, thereby bringing into question their value as indicators of the hypothetical cerebral damage occurring in fielddependent subjects.…”
Section: Cerebral Localization Of Field Dependence-independence Measuressupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Significant differences in support of their hypothesis (i.e., as a function of location of lesion) were found only in the case of the tactile tests. Garrick (1978) supported Pizzamiglio and Carli's interpretation, pointing out certain similarities between field independence and functions traditionally attributed to the right hemisphere (concept formation, creativity, management of spatial information, etc.). This author also criticized the conclusions reached by Berent and his coworkers, citing studies in which verbal paired-associate tasks had been equated with imaginative processes related to the right hemisphere, thereby bringing into question their value as indicators of the hypothetical cerebral damage occurring in fielddependent subjects.…”
Section: Cerebral Localization Of Field Dependence-independence Measuressupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The results from early studies of the relation between field dependence–independence and cerebral functions suggest that differences between FD and FI individuals are more than just general preferences, or deficiencies, based in one or the other hemisphere (e.g., Garrick, 1978; Falcone, 1985; Pizzamiglio & Carli, 1974; see also Tinajero, Paramo, Cadaveira, & Rodriguez-Holguin, 1993, for a review). Researchers generally agree that FD subjects display greater between-hemisphere coherence, suggesting less hemispheric differentiation or specialization (e.g., O'Connor & Shaw, 1977; Oltman, Semple, & Goldstein, 1979).…”
Section: Perspectives From Cognitive Science and Neurosciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of these tests, the Rod and Frame test, some subjects are more affec~ed by the position of a central rod (termed "field Independent" Indlvlduals) while the responses of others are more reiated to the position of the frame surrounding the rod ("field dependent" subjects) (14). In terms of "dominant" hemispheres, field dependent Individuals have been characterized as left hemisphere dominant, and those displaying field Independence as right hemisphere dominant (70).…”
Section: Field Deoendence/indeoendence--researchers Have Discoveredmentioning
confidence: 99%