2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field assessment of microbial inoculants to control Rhizoctonia root rot on wheat

Abstract: One sentence summary: Microbial strains applied as seed coatings were assessed in the field for control of Rhizoctonia root rot on wheat. AbstractRhizoctonia root rot caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG8 is a major disease in dryland cereal crops. Previous research identified a suite of microbes using in planta bioassay screening that are effective as seed-coated inoculants for control of Rhizoctonia root rot on wheat. This paper assessed 23 strains in fields in Australia with a history of naturally occurring R. s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, wheat plants grown in soil contaminated by the pathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani , inoculated with Streptomyces sp. F5, showed lower root damage and higher grain yield, compared to untreated controls (Barnett et al, 2019). Species of Rhodococcus inoculated in wheat showed interesting PGP activities, increasing straw and grain weights, compared to non-inoculated control (Basheer et al, 2016), while some isolates from wheat rhizosphere enhanced plant sulphur availability by desulfonating carbon-bound sulfonate-sulphur (Schmalenberger et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, wheat plants grown in soil contaminated by the pathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani , inoculated with Streptomyces sp. F5, showed lower root damage and higher grain yield, compared to untreated controls (Barnett et al, 2019). Species of Rhodococcus inoculated in wheat showed interesting PGP activities, increasing straw and grain weights, compared to non-inoculated control (Basheer et al, 2016), while some isolates from wheat rhizosphere enhanced plant sulphur availability by desulfonating carbon-bound sulfonate-sulphur (Schmalenberger et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(Franco et al, 2016) described as biocontrol agents (BCA) 1, 2, and 3, respectively, were used in this study. BCA1, BCA2, and BCA3 had previously reduced Rhizoctonia root rot in both pot bioassays and in the field and have demonstrated in vitro inhibition against R. solani (Barnett et al, 2017; Barnett et al, 2019). The strains were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and stored in culture collections of endophytic bacteria kept at Flinders University.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rhizoctonia root rot is difficult to control due to its wide host range (Cook et al, 2002), lack of commercially available resistant cereal cultivars, and increased prevalence in direct drill or minimal tillage practices (Schillinger and Paulitz, 2006). Current options for partial control include strategic tillage below seeds (Roget et al, 1996), removal of the green bridge with herbicide timing (Roget et al, 1987; Babiker et al, 2011), rotation with non-cereal crops (Angus et al, 2015), and in-furrow chemical fungicide treatments (Roget et al, 1987), and more recently, by using biocontrol-coated seeds (Franco et al, 2007; Barnett et al, 2019). Currently, the estimated cost of control measures is A$106 million annually (Murray and Brennan, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field applications of Trichoderma spp. have demonstrated a positive effect on biocontrol of R. solani (Barnett et al 2019). However, field environmental conditions are still one of the main limitations for the use of biocontrol agents (Bashan et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%