2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00357.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fidelity of Implementation and Instructional Alignment in Response to Intervention Research

Abstract: In this review, we explore the extent to which researchers evaluating the efficacy of Tier 2 elementary reading interventions within the framework of Response to Intervention reported on fidelity of implementation and alignment of instruction between tiers. A literature search identified 22 empirical studies from which conclusions were drawn. Results suggest that fidelity of implementation is typically monitored at Tier 2 and that alignment between tiers of intervention is often apparent yet not explicitly sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional detail regarding Tier 1 instruction is also limited in many studies. As has been noted in previous research, information on the quality of the core classroom reading instruction that students receive along with the targeted intervention would also help differentiate instructional characteristics that are most correlated with improved student achievement (Hill, King, Lemons, & Partanen, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additional detail regarding Tier 1 instruction is also limited in many studies. As has been noted in previous research, information on the quality of the core classroom reading instruction that students receive along with the targeted intervention would also help differentiate instructional characteristics that are most correlated with improved student achievement (Hill, King, Lemons, & Partanen, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Notably, these studies consistently included at least three of the five core components deemed essential for RTI implementation according to Gersten et al's (2009) Practice Guide for Response to Intervention (universal screening, progress monitoring, increasingly intensive tiers of intervention, and fidelity of implementation). However, with regard to the component of a high quality core reading program, the effectiveness or quality of Tier 1 instruction has not been consistently observed; thus it is not clear that the field has yet established that students provided a Tier 2 or 3 intervention had also received high quality core or Tier 1 instruction (Hill, King, Lemons, & Partanen, 2012). Furthermore only a few studies have provided increasingly intensive layers of intervention within a study year and/or have allowed students to fluidly move up or down a tier as may be necessary in school-implemented RTI models (e.g., Authors, Beach & O'Connor; O'Connor et al).…”
Section: Longitudinal Multi-tier Rti Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those components with less research are noteworthy, in particular the effectiveness of Tier 1 has been documented rarely (Hill et al, 2012). Moreover, despite calls for layers of increasing intensive intervention, in only three studies have students been allowed to move across tiers within a study year and only two allowed movement up or down a tier.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%