1997
DOI: 10.1006/jasc.1997.0194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FIBS in Archaeobotany: Functional Interpretation of Weed Floras in Relation to Husbandry Practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were analysed using ArcGIS 10.3.1 in order to detect any associations between topographical Charles, Jones, and Hodgson 1997;Bogaard et al 1999;Jones et al 2000;Bogaard et al 2001; for fuller explanations).…”
Section: Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were analysed using ArcGIS 10.3.1 in order to detect any associations between topographical Charles, Jones, and Hodgson 1997;Bogaard et al 1999;Jones et al 2000;Bogaard et al 2001; for fuller explanations).…”
Section: Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three study areas were chosen (all of which have been the subject of research on the relationship between crop-growing conditions and weed ecology): the Borja area of northern Spain (Charles, Jones and Hodgson 1997;Jones et al 1995), the area around the village of Tharounia on the Greek island of Evvia (Jones 2005;Jones et al 1999), and the area in and around Wadi Ibn Hammâd in Jordan . Records of crop treatment were compiled through interviews with local cultivators and irrigation supervisors to enable a comparison between water availability and Δ 13 C values (Table 1), but variability in water conditions is expected, given that multiple farmers were involved, and fields were spread over large areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is suitable, assuming that the response of the taxa to environmental factors did not change and that the combinations of environmental conditions are comparable between the past and nowadays (actualism), so that most probably the composition of vegetation did not change very much over time. A disadvantage of using abiotic values is that these are based on field observations of growth locations, but insight in which factors influence the occurrence of a taxon is lacking (Bogaard 2004, p. 7;Charles et al 1997Charles et al , p. 1152. Therefore, Charles et al (1997) and Bogaard (2004) propose using functional attributes (biotic factors) such as leaf life span and root length to reconstruct vegetation types for which one might assume that a modern analogy of a combination of factors influencing the chances of a taxon occurring is lacking: a prime example is arable weed vegetation.…”
Section: Individualistic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%