2013
DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2013.821671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable carbon isotope analysis as a direct means of inferring crop water status and water management practices

Abstract: Stable carbon isotope analysis of plant remains is a promising tool for researchers studying palaeoclimate and past agricultural systems. The potential of the technique is clear: it offers a direct measure of the water conditions in which plants grew. In this paper, we assess how reliably stable carbon isotope discrimination can be used to infer water conditions, through the analysis of present-day crop plants grown at multiple locations across the Mediterranean and south-west Asia. The key findings are that: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

15
187
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
15
187
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Araus et al 1997;Bogaard et al 2007;Fraser et al 2011;Wallace et al 2013;Fiorentino et al 2015). Thus variation in crop stable isotope values offers a useful way to investigate the ecology of present and past farming systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Araus et al 1997;Bogaard et al 2007;Fraser et al 2011;Wallace et al 2013;Fiorentino et al 2015). Thus variation in crop stable isotope values offers a useful way to investigate the ecology of present and past farming systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C values suggest poorly to moderately well-watered conditions ( Figure 13) in comparison with thresholds established for modern barley (Wallace et al 2013). Cereal δ…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fig. 1 (12,13,(16)(17)(18), experimental work on the effects of charring (19,20), and associated arable weed assemblages (4,5,21,22). The sites mostly date to the earlier Neolithic in their respective regions (Table 1) and were selected on the basis of richness in well-preserved charred crop material (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%