2013
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibroscan can avoid liver biopsy in Indian patients with chronic hepatitis B

Abstract: Fibroscan accurately assessed fibrosis and could avoid liver biopsy in more than two-thirds of patients with CHB.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The full texts of 165 potentially eligible reports were obtained for further assessment. Of those, 19 papers were included in the review following full-text screening [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The full texts of 165 potentially eligible reports were obtained for further assessment. Of those, 19 papers were included in the review following full-text screening [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TE is a noninvasive method gaining increasing acceptance in clinical practice. This method may reduce the need for liver biopsy and help to monitor the efficacy of treatment [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Transient elastography (TE, Fibroscan; Echosens, Paris, France) is a new non‐invasive diagnostic test developed in the last decade to assess liver stiffness . Many studies have evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of this technology . While several meta‐analyses have already been conducted in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC), there have been only a few meta‐analyses performed in CHB patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LSM of patients were as follows (KPa): G1F0, 3.0 ± 1.2; G1F1, 4.5 ± 2.2; G2F2, 8.3 ± 2.4; G3F3, 10.2 ± 5.3; G4F4, 16.1 ± 4.5 ( P < 0.05 respectively). The cutoff values were: ≥4.9 for F1, ≥5.6 for F2, ≥7.2 for F3, ≥10.8 for F4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%