2023
DOI: 10.3390/polym15020278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiber Reinforced Polymer Debonding Failure Identification Using Smart Materials in Strengthened T-Shaped Reinforced Concrete Beams

Abstract: The favorable contribution of externally bonded fiber-reinforced polymer (EB-FRP) sheets to the shear strengthening of reinforced concrete (RC) beams is widely acknowledged. Nonetheless, the premature debonding of EB-FRP materials remains a limitation for widespread on-site application. Once debonding appears, it is highly likely that brittle failure will occur in the strengthened RC structural member; therefore, it is essential to be alerted of the debonding incident immediately and to intervene. This may not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the failures of the GTRM system, 52% of the brick masonry walls strengthened with the CTRM system presented three different types of failures: rupture, grid slippage, and the debonding of the composite layer due to loss of adhesion [50][51][52][53][54]. Premature debonding failures of carbon fiber polymer materials have also been obtained in reinforced concrete structural members under shear loading [55][56][57]. The other 48% of the examined specimens failed in the masonry substrate, presenting with toe crushing and diagonal tension damages in the brick units [58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Similar to the failures of the GTRM system, 52% of the brick masonry walls strengthened with the CTRM system presented three different types of failures: rupture, grid slippage, and the debonding of the composite layer due to loss of adhesion [50][51][52][53][54]. Premature debonding failures of carbon fiber polymer materials have also been obtained in reinforced concrete structural members under shear loading [55][56][57]. The other 48% of the examined specimens failed in the masonry substrate, presenting with toe crushing and diagonal tension damages in the brick units [58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Real-time measurements of the EMI were performed using a custom-made device called a "Wireless impedance/Admittance Monitoring System (WiAMS)" and a network of PZT transducers. These devices have been extensively presented in various experimental programs by [20][21][22]26,27], proving their efficacy in detecting and evaluating damage severity in RC and FRC structural members. The theoretical components and additional information about the proposed SHM system can be found in [28,29].…”
Section: Shm Technique and Pzt Transducer Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the utilization of small-sized piezoelectric transducers that could be surface-bonded or embedded has gained widespread acceptance in EMI-based methods for SHM of concrete structural members due to their ability to act as both (a) a sensor, receiving a mechanical signal, and (b) an actuator, creating a mechanical vibration [18,19]. A reliable assessment methodology was successfully developed for SHM and assessing damage identification levels in RC structural members through a thorough investigation by Chalioris et al [20]. Notably, the reinforced concrete structural members were subjected to monotonic [21] or cyclic loading [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of existing research studies in the broader literature have examined the effectiveness of EMI-based SHM of concrete due to several degradation causes, including the corrosion of steel bars in RC elements [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ], concrete cover loss [ 18 ], the influence of the heating time [ 19 ], artificial cracks, and mass loss [ 20 , 21 ]. Furthermore, real-scale members of RC structures have been examined, such as beams [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ], frames [ 31 ], and joints [ 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%