2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiber-optic Michelson interferometer fixed in a tilted tube for direction-dependent ultrasonic detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with piezoelectric transducer, cantilever beam, tuning fork and other ultrasonic sensors, the newly emerged optical fiber ultrasonic sensors have advantages of small size, wide bandwidth, and high sensitivity [10]. In 2017, Gang et al [11] proposed a miniature compact Michelson interferometer, which completed a highly sensitive detection of 100~300 kHz ultrasound wave using a gold film deposit fiber tip. Another Fabry-Perot interferometer (FPI) ultrasonic transducer achieved noise equivalent sound pressure as low as 2 Pa and a bandwidth of -6 dB greater than 22.5 MHz, but the consistency is an issue for FPI ultrasonic sensor, Moreover, its demodulation usually depends on a narrow linewidth tunable laser with high cost [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with piezoelectric transducer, cantilever beam, tuning fork and other ultrasonic sensors, the newly emerged optical fiber ultrasonic sensors have advantages of small size, wide bandwidth, and high sensitivity [10]. In 2017, Gang et al [11] proposed a miniature compact Michelson interferometer, which completed a highly sensitive detection of 100~300 kHz ultrasound wave using a gold film deposit fiber tip. Another Fabry-Perot interferometer (FPI) ultrasonic transducer achieved noise equivalent sound pressure as low as 2 Pa and a bandwidth of -6 dB greater than 22.5 MHz, but the consistency is an issue for FPI ultrasonic sensor, Moreover, its demodulation usually depends on a narrow linewidth tunable laser with high cost [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, however, many steps forward have been made and tools are presently available that can detect ultrasonic waves even in the presence of non-reflective surfaces and with a certain roughness. Interferometers (Michelson’s variant, in their simplest form 17 , 18 ) are based on the interference between the optical beam emitted by the instrument and the optical beam reflected from the surface to be inspected. Vibrometers represent a particular type of interferometers based on the Doppler effect (laser Doppler vibrometers 19 ): for effective ultrasound detection, the emitted laser beam is immediately split into two beams, one with an additional frequency component resulting from the passage through an acousto-optic modulator; the differences between the two beams in frequency terms, more evident because of the preliminary passage in the modulator, provide the speed of the particles on the surface rather than their displacement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fiber optic-based ultrasonic sensors detect UWs through high-speed recording of the intensity, wavelength, phase, and polarization of light propagating through optical fibers. Previously reported fiber optic-based ultrasonic sensors mainly include intensity modulation of fiber optic sensors (IMFOS), interferometric fiber optic sensors (IFOS), and fiber optic grating sensors (FOGS) [ 10 ]. Although IMFOS have shown high sensitivity and broadband frequency response in the detection of UW, they still have some shortcomings, such as poor stability of the UW detection and low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and single-point detection [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%