2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9153107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) Sensors in a High-Scattering Optical Fiber Doped with MgO Nanoparticles for Polarization-Dependent Temperature Sensing

Abstract: The characterization of Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors on a high-scattering fiber, having the core doped with MgO nanoparticles for polarization-dependent temperature sensing is reported. The fiber has a scattering level 37.2 dB higher than a single-mode fiber. FBGs have been inscribed by mean of a near-infrared femtosecond laser and a phase mask, with Bragg wavelength around 1552 nm. The characterization shows a thermal sensitivity of 11.45 pm/°C. A polarization-selective thermal behavior has been obtained… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The scattering gain recorded with the M01 preform, which appears as the most interesting method for SLMux, has a range of 5.7 dB (37.2-42.9 dB), while the two-way loss achieves a minimum of 22.1 dB/m and a maximum of 30.8 dB/m. This fiber has been used by Beisenova et al and Molardi et al [18,19,30], and the data are in agreement with Table 2, with some fluctuations also due to the random nature of nanoparticle distribution. Conversely, fibers drawn from the G22 fiber, achieve a higher gain (47.5-49.3 dB), but losses fall with a 10× higher rate, up to almost 300 dB/m [30].…”
Section: Performance Analysissupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The scattering gain recorded with the M01 preform, which appears as the most interesting method for SLMux, has a range of 5.7 dB (37.2-42.9 dB), while the two-way loss achieves a minimum of 22.1 dB/m and a maximum of 30.8 dB/m. This fiber has been used by Beisenova et al and Molardi et al [18,19,30], and the data are in agreement with Table 2, with some fluctuations also due to the random nature of nanoparticle distribution. Conversely, fibers drawn from the G22 fiber, achieve a higher gain (47.5-49.3 dB), but losses fall with a 10× higher rate, up to almost 300 dB/m [30].…”
Section: Performance Analysissupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This fiber has been used by Beisenova et al and Molardi et al [18,19,30], and the data are in agreement with Table 2, with some fluctuations also due to the random nature of nanoparticle distribution. Conversely, fibers drawn from the G22 fiber, achieve a higher gain (47.5-49.3 dB), but losses fall with a 10× higher rate, up to almost 300 dB/m [30]. In the middle between the two preforms, the R04 fiber pattern achieves a gain of 40.0 dB and losses of 134.0 dB/m.…”
Section: Performance Analysissupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…108 At high temperature, it is difficult to record results using bare FBG due to low thermal coefficient of silica. Research has been conducted to improve sensitivity at high temperature using coating on FBG, 109 doping of certain material in silica, [110][111][112] formation of stable, 113 or using polymer optical fiber. In polymer optical fiber as proposed in Ref.…”
Section: Fbg-based Strain Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%