2015
DOI: 10.2337/dc14-2551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fetal Sex and Maternal Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: The Impact of Having a Boy

Abstract: OBJECTIVERetrospective analyses of perinatal databases have raised the intriguing possibility of an increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in women carrying a male fetus, but it has been unclear if this was a spurious association. We thus sought to evaluate the relationship between fetal sex and maternal glucose metabolism in a well-characterized cohort of women reflecting the full spectrum of gestational glucose tolerance from normal to mildly abnormal to GDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSA total… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
132
3
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
132
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 20 studies [1,3,4,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] that met inclusion criteria provide data on 2,402,643 women. A study from Retnakaran and Shah [4] evaluated the risk for GDM conferred by fetal sex in a first pregnancy and, in those women in whom it was applicable, the analogous risk in a second pregnancy such that, in the pooled analyses, the first and second pregnancies from this study were entered as two separate reports.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The 20 studies [1,3,4,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] that met inclusion criteria provide data on 2,402,643 women. A study from Retnakaran and Shah [4] evaluated the risk for GDM conferred by fetal sex in a first pregnancy and, in those women in whom it was applicable, the analogous risk in a second pregnancy such that, in the pooled analyses, the first and second pregnancies from this study were entered as two separate reports.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we performed a sensitivity analysis based on the stringency of the diagnostic approach for identifying GDM that was applied in the studies. In this analysis, we included only the seven studies [1,3,18,25,[28][29][30] that used the two-step approach to diagnose GDM (i.e. screening test followed by an OGTT) that was recently recommended by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Panel [31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations