1994
DOI: 10.3109/14767059409017271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Fetal Growth Charts”: Comparison of Cross-Sectional Ultrasound Examinations with Birth Weight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results are more consistent with a notion that peak length velocity occurs later in gestation, possibly early in the third trimester, and/or that the velocity curve is flatter and extends into the third trimester. The latter suggestion of a flatter, more prolonged length growth curve is supported by some ultrasound studies of normal pregnancies in women from developed countries (Bertino et al, 1996;Bernstein et al, 1994Bernstein et al, , 1997.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present results are more consistent with a notion that peak length velocity occurs later in gestation, possibly early in the third trimester, and/or that the velocity curve is flatter and extends into the third trimester. The latter suggestion of a flatter, more prolonged length growth curve is supported by some ultrasound studies of normal pregnancies in women from developed countries (Bertino et al, 1996;Bernstein et al, 1994Bernstein et al, , 1997.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The precise timing of the peak in fetal linear growth and the ponderal velocity is not known, however, due to the reliance on cross-sectional data on fetal size at birth (Cronk, 1983). Several studies have shown that fetal growth curves based on ultra-sound differ from those based on crosssectional data, but also have confirmed that growth in length proceeds in advance of growth in mass in normal full-term births (Hediger et al, 1995;Goldenberg et al, 1985;Ott, 1993;Bernstein et al, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birth weight percentile was determined using locally derived cross-sectional hybrid growth curves validated against intrauterine fetal growth patterns [19][20][21]. These curves combine cross-sectionally acquired preterm (535 weeks gestation) ultrasound estimates of fetal weight with near-term and term birth weight to generate accurate modelling of longitudinal intrauterine growth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birth weight percentile was determined using locally derived cross-sectional hybrid growth curves validated against intrauterine fetal growth patterns [19–21]. These curves combine cross-sectionally acquired preterm (<35 weeks gestation) ultrasound estimates of fetal weight with near-term and term birth weight to generate accurate modeling of longitudinal intrauterine growth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%