2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasi.2016.08.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fetal foot length for assessment of gestational age: A comprehensive study in north India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However in the present study correlation coefficient between FFL1 and gestational age (r = 0.828, p < 0.0001) and between FFL1 and femur length (r = 0.915, p < 0.0001) was found. The variation in values in our study was lower or higher due to significant racial and socioeconomic differences between individuals of the present study and that of previous studies such as the comparison between the values of FFL1 of present study with previous studies done by Pandey V D et al [14], Rajesh Bardale et al [15], Shripad Hebbar et al [8], Andrzej et al [13] and Joshi et al [7].…”
Section: 3% Male Female Unknown Open Journal Of Medical Imagingsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However in the present study correlation coefficient between FFL1 and gestational age (r = 0.828, p < 0.0001) and between FFL1 and femur length (r = 0.915, p < 0.0001) was found. The variation in values in our study was lower or higher due to significant racial and socioeconomic differences between individuals of the present study and that of previous studies such as the comparison between the values of FFL1 of present study with previous studies done by Pandey V D et al [14], Rajesh Bardale et al [15], Shripad Hebbar et al [8], Andrzej et al [13] and Joshi et al [7].…”
Section: 3% Male Female Unknown Open Journal Of Medical Imagingsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In the present study FFL1 showed good correlation with gestational age with correlation coefficient 0.828 with p < 0.0001, FFL2 showed good correlation with gestational age with correlation coefficient 0.817 with p < 0.0001, and FFW showed good correlation with gestational age with correlation coefficient 0.720 with p < 0.0001. Pandey V D et al [14] in 2015 conducted their study in 100 pregnant women between 15 to 36 weeks of gestation in 2nd and 3rd trimesters , their study is a comprehensive study in North India demonstrated a strong correlation on comparison of linear regression of foot length versus gestational age with correlation coefficient (r = 0.960, p < 0.001) which is comparatively much higher than the FFL1 in the present study has showing correlation coefficient (r = 0.828, p < 0.001). Although both studies were consistent, with the mean foot length (17.5 ± 1.29) in 15 weeks and mean sonographic foot length at 36 weeks of gestation (64.4 ± 3.28) which was closely related to the present study in which the mean FFL1 was.…”
Section: 3% Male Female Unknown Open Journal Of Medical Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethical Clearance was obtained from the University's Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (No: BE 390/15). Gestational ages (12 to 20 weeks) were determined as per Pandey et al (2016) method. All specimens were bilaterally micro-dissected to expose the vascular supply of the suprarenal glands utilizing a standard Carl Zeiss Stemi DV4 stereo-microscope.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gestational age was estimated using the formula y = 7.130 + 0.503x, where y = gestational age in weeks and x = fetal foot length in mm (Pandey et al, 2015). The length and external diameter of the proximal RCA and LCA was measured with the length of the RCA measured from its origin to its first branch.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%