1994
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1994.04010034.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fetal biometry at 14–40 weeks' gestation

Abstract: Normal ranges for a wide variety of biometrical parameters were established from cross-sectional data on 1040 normal singleton pregnancies resulting in livebirth at term of normal, and appropriately grown infants. Patients were selected so that the birth weight distribution was similar to that reported by Yudkin and colleagues' and the ranges can, therefore, be used for any population that has a similar birth weight distribution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

20
472
5
15

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 487 publications
(516 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
20
472
5
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The brains were not removed from the skulls. The GA at the moment of the MR imaging examination was based on sonographic data 18 and defined as the number of complete GWs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brains were not removed from the skulls. The GA at the moment of the MR imaging examination was based on sonographic data 18 and defined as the number of complete GWs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 The fetal weight was estimated (EFW) according to Hadlock 24 using the biparietal diameter, head and abdomen circumference and femur length. A head/abdominal circumference ratio above the 95th centile indicated asymmetric growth; 25 an AFI less than 5 cm oligohydramnios; a subjectively increased cardiothoracic ratio or pericardial effusion were considered abnormal cardiac findings; bowel was considered echogenic when comparable to bone; a middle cerebral artery PI below the fifth percentile or a placentocerebral ratio greater than 1 ( ¼ umbilical artery PI divided by middle cerebral artery PI) indicated redistribution. Small-for-gestational age (SGA) was defined as a birth weight below the 10th percentile for this population and severe SGA below the third percentile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formerly, normal biometric data were taken mainly from studies of PF biometry in ultrasonographic imaging. [8][9][10][11][12] However, MR imaging has advantages over sonography when assessing fetal PF, such as better accuracy when evaluating the vermis and better contrast resolution, which enable evaluation of the brain stem. 13,14 Therefore, during the past 2 decades, MR imaging has become an important tool to prenatally evaluate the morphology of the PF, and many studies have been published to supply valid MR imaging biometric data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%