1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58338-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertilizing ability of sperm with unexplained in vitro fertilization failures as assessed by the zona-free hamster egg penetration assay: its prognostic value for sperm-oolemma interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some available sperm function tests including sperm penetration test, Acrobeads test, and hypoosmotic swelling test [3,5,11]. Accurate determination of the motion characteristics of spermatozoa is also important for the diagnosis of male factor infertility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some available sperm function tests including sperm penetration test, Acrobeads test, and hypoosmotic swelling test [3,5,11]. Accurate determination of the motion characteristics of spermatozoa is also important for the diagnosis of male factor infertility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the WHO [1999] standardized the laboratory procedures involved in assessing human semen, the fundamental problem remains that the conventional criteria of semen quality are of limited prognostic value in predicting pregnancy rate [Aitken et al 1985;Bostofte et al 1990]. There are various available sperm function tests, including the Acrobeads test, hypoosmotic swelling test, and the hemizona assay [Wolf et al 1996;Jeyendran et al 1984;Morshedi et al 1995]. Accurate determination of the motion characteristics of spermatozoa is also important for the diagnosis of male factor infertility, but standard manual semen analysis is a rather subjective technique associated with large inter-laboratory variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sperm parameters concentration, motility and morphology are, however, claimed to be poor predictors of a male´s fertility status, this in natural conception Guzick et al, 2001) as well as in assisted reproductive techniques (ART) (Wolf et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%