1999
DOI: 10.2307/176626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertilization Effects on Interactions between above- and Belowground Competition in an Old Field

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecology.Abstract. Recent theoretical and experimental studies have address… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
197
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(103 reference statements)
5
197
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6) in accordance with findings of Agele et al (2007) and Kotowski et al (2000). The competition of Eucalyptus for nutrients can be overcome somewhat by adding fertilizers (Ayoola and Makinde, 2008;Cahill, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6) in accordance with findings of Agele et al (2007) and Kotowski et al (2000). The competition of Eucalyptus for nutrients can be overcome somewhat by adding fertilizers (Ayoola and Makinde, 2008;Cahill, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other results for Cahill et al [10] showed that root competition in the first stages of plant's life cycle leads into weak growth and decreases plant light interception. Another study conducted Ebwongu et al [11] results showed that productivity of the potato crop decreased when intercropped with maize compared to the plantation of sole potato, while; it increased by increasing plant density during intercropping treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In each plot, one individual of each target species was transplanted into one hole with a PVC tube (without interaction) and another one was transplanted into the hole without a PVC tube (with interaction). For the shoot interaction-free treatments we tied down the shoots of the neighboring plants using netting, whereas for shoot interaction treatments we left the neighboring plants unmanipulated ( Wilson and Tilman 1991;Twolan-Strutt and Keddy 1996;Cahill 1999Cahill , 2002aCahill , b, 2003 CaCI 2 solution, and again with distilled water. These plant materials were oven-dried (60°C for 48 h), weighed, ground and analyzed for total N and at.% 15 N. Soil samples were sieved to 2 mm to remove coarse fragments for measuring moisture, pH, microbial biomass N and exchangeable inorganic N. Dried subsamples were ground to a fine powder and, after removal of carbonates by diluted HCI, used to measure soil organic carbon (SOC) and total N.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%