1991
DOI: 10.2307/2133557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertility Decline and Pronatalist Policy in Singapore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surveys of women in these countries show that most young women would like to start a family (Lee, Alvarez, and Palen 1991; Westley et al 2010); however, with the expanded opportunities to continue their education and develop their careers, they are marrying later or not marrying at all. Increasing social acceptance of premarital sex and the cost of raising a family (including the opportunity cost for the woman who interrupts her career to give birth) are further deterrents to marriage and having children (Call et al 2008; Westley et al 2010).…”
Section: The Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveys of women in these countries show that most young women would like to start a family (Lee, Alvarez, and Palen 1991; Westley et al 2010); however, with the expanded opportunities to continue their education and develop their careers, they are marrying later or not marrying at all. Increasing social acceptance of premarital sex and the cost of raising a family (including the opportunity cost for the woman who interrupts her career to give birth) are further deterrents to marriage and having children (Call et al 2008; Westley et al 2010).…”
Section: The Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in East Asian countries where fertility has reached lowest-low levels, governments have launched ambitious pronatalist policies, which however remain without clear effect (Eun 2007;Jones et al 2008;Lee 2009a;Lee et al 1991;Lee 2009b;McDonald 2006a;Suzuki 2006Suzuki , 2009. It is likely that one of the key factors in the success of pronatalist policies in Mongolia is the fact that these programs were adopted before the emergence in the society, and more importantly in people's minds, of low and lowest-low fertility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1966, Singapore implemented policies intended to lower fertility further (Cheung, 1998, p. 155). The relative success of the fertility reduction program in Singapore, in comparison to programs in other countries with similar goals, has been widely noted (Fawcett & Khoo, 1980;Lee, Alvarez & Palen, 1991;Saw, 1975). Figure 1 shows the total fertility rate (TFR) 1 in Singapore 1950(United Nations, 2001.…”
Section: Fertility Policies In Singapore Since 1966mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Education policies: Priority in choice of school is given to first and second children if a parent was sterilized before age 40 and if no more than three children were born; (3) Income tax policies: Income tax deductions are lower or not given for the third and later children; (4) Housing policies: Large families no longer have priority in obtaining larger units in public housing, and those families with no more than three children are allowed to sublet rooms; (5) Other policies: Government employees get paid leave after sterilization, and abortion and sterilization are heavily subsidized (Fawcett, 1979;Fawcett & Khoo, 1980;Lee et al, 1991).…”
Section: Fertility Policies In Singapore Since 1966mentioning
confidence: 99%