2000
DOI: 10.1080/10588330091134310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ferrous Iron Treatment of Soils Contaminated with Arsenic-Containing Wood-Preserving Solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentration of As in the first step of a sequential extraction, which included the most labile As fraction, was greatly reduced with the FeSO 4 addition (Yang et al 2007). Moore et al (2000) used FeSO 4 to immobilize As in contaminated soils from wood-preserving solution at a timber-framing site and achieved good results. The result of Kim and Davis (3003) also showed that with ferric sulfate or ferrous sulfate addition, the mobility and solubility of Pb did not increase.…”
Section: Water-soluble As and Cacl 2 -Extractable Pbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of As in the first step of a sequential extraction, which included the most labile As fraction, was greatly reduced with the FeSO 4 addition (Yang et al 2007). Moore et al (2000) used FeSO 4 to immobilize As in contaminated soils from wood-preserving solution at a timber-framing site and achieved good results. The result of Kim and Davis (3003) also showed that with ferric sulfate or ferrous sulfate addition, the mobility and solubility of Pb did not increase.…”
Section: Water-soluble As and Cacl 2 -Extractable Pbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferrous sulfate has been used as a binding agent for the treatment of arsenic-contaminated soils by other researchers (Voigot et al, 1996;Moore et al, 2000); however, these studies also failed to find any evidence of insoluble ferric arsenate being produced. The previous characterization study of untreated FW and BH soils showed that arsenic was primarily associated with soil particle surfaces, rather than located in individual arsenic-rich grains (Yang and Donahoe, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, the addition of FeSO 4 decreased the stability of Pb, Zn, Cu and Cd in soil. Comparing the different effectiveness of FeSO 4 on heavy metals and As, it can be deduced that FeSO 4 had exclusive stabilizing capacity for As (Moore, et al, 2000, Carlson, et al, 2002. Other single stabilizers including CaO and Na 2 S also presented high stabilizing capacity for As in soil.…”
Section: The Stabilizing Effectiveness Of the Single Stabilizersmentioning
confidence: 97%