2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.63.174437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ferromagnetic resonance excitation of two-dimensional wall structures in magnetic stripe domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These conditions for excitation of the two modes are completely comparable to those of the domain resonance modes, as described in Ref. [6].…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These conditions for excitation of the two modes are completely comparable to those of the domain resonance modes, as described in Ref. [6].…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…2a-c for an extended film and two stripes with different domain width. This damped oscillation is kicked off by the additional field h pulse and not continuously forced and excited as in regular ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) experiments, in which a steady rf-field is applied [6,7]. In this sense the effect may be considered as a free oscillation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Twodimensional ͑2D͒ periodic micromagnetic simulations were performed in order to extract information about the magnetic domain structure in the ͓Pt/ Co͔-NiFe system at remanence after application of a large in-plane magnetic field. In the micromagnetic model, 8 the ͓Pt/ Co͔ multilayer was considered as a single FM layer having the same characteristics as the multilayer. The material parameters used for the ͓Pt/ Co͔ multilayer were the exchange constant A ex =3 ϫ 10 −7 erg/ cm, the out-of-plane uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant K u = 2.195ϫ 10 6 erg/ cm 3 , and the saturation magnetization M s = 388 emu/ cm 3 resulting in a quality factor Q = K u / ͑2M s 2 ͒ = 2.3 comparable to values reported in the literature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4(b) differ in three important points: the EA loop has (i) a 20% higher coercivity H c , (ii) a 20% higher remanence M r , but (iii) an almost 50% lower critical field H crit compared to the HA loop. For FMR measurements, the influence of different relative orientations of stripe domains and rf magnetic field H rf has been shown to lead to higher (lower) resonance frequencies in case of parallel (perpendicular) alignment as a result of the excitation of optical (acoustic) modes due to out-of-phase (in-phase) precession of the magnetization in adjacent stripe domains 8,10,12,22,23,37 . However, the way the FMR measurements in this work have been performed, stripe domains and rf magnetic field H rf (dc magnetic field H) are always perpendicular (parallel) during the entire hysteresis cycle and independent of the field sweep direction as simulated in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%