2023
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00278-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ferric carboxymaltose versus standard-of-care oral iron to treat second-trimester anaemia in Malawian pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The review included 8061 women meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Out of 34 selected studies, 20 24 , 32 49 are from Low- and Middle-income countries like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Malawi. All the selected 34 studies are randomised controlled trials and were available in full text for review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The review included 8061 women meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Out of 34 selected studies, 20 24 , 32 49 are from Low- and Middle-income countries like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Malawi. All the selected 34 studies are randomised controlled trials and were available in full text for review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomization process was detailed in 22 studies 18 , 19 , 54 73 , while insufficient information was available from ten studies 74 83 , no information from two studies 84 , 85 while only one study reported the selection through non-random allocation sequence 86 . Allocation concealment was described adequately using opaque envelopes in 12 studies 18 , 55 , 60 , 62 – 66 , 68 , 69 , 72 , 76 , while remaining did not indicate allocation concealment in their studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the observations in our study of a minimal association between hemoglobin and iron biomarkers could explain why trials based on hemoglobin alone as a marker of iron deficiency anemia for assessment of outcome of supplementation are not effective. For example, a recent trial by Pasricha et al 31 could not show differences in hemoglobin as a primary outcome when comparing anemic pregnant women receiving intravenous iron with those receiving oral iron, although a significant correction of iron deficiency and overall reduction of iron deficiency anemia was noted in the group receiving intravenous iron.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%