2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.08.21.254995
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ferrets not infected by SARS-CoV-2 in a high-exposure domestic setting

Abstract: Ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) are mustelids of special relevance to laboratory studies of respiratory viruses and have been shown to be susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and onward transmission. Here, we report the results of a natural experiment where 29 ferrets in one home had prolonged, direct contact and constant environmental exposure to two humans with symptomatic COVID-19. We observed no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 transmission into the household ferret population via RT-PCR and ELISA. To better understa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Insofar as data limitations (e.g., limited ACE2 sequences or species trait data) preclude perfect computational predictions of zoonotic capacity, laboratory experiments are also limited in assessing true zoonotic capacity. For SARS-CoV-2 and other host-pathogen systems, animals that are readily infected in the lab appear to be less susceptible in non-lab settings (ferrets in the lab vs. mixed results in ferrets as pets (OIE, 2021;Sawatzki et al, 2020;Schlottau et al, 2020); rabbits in the lab vs. rabbits as pets (Mykytyn et al, 2021;Ruiz-Arrondo et al, 2020)). Moreover, wildlife hosts that are confirmed to shed multiple zoonotic viruses in natural settings (e.g., bats, (Peel et al, 2019)) can be much less tractable for laboratory investigations (for instance, requiring high biosecurity containment and very limited sample sizes).…”
Section: Mapping Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insofar as data limitations (e.g., limited ACE2 sequences or species trait data) preclude perfect computational predictions of zoonotic capacity, laboratory experiments are also limited in assessing true zoonotic capacity. For SARS-CoV-2 and other host-pathogen systems, animals that are readily infected in the lab appear to be less susceptible in non-lab settings (ferrets in the lab vs. mixed results in ferrets as pets (OIE, 2021;Sawatzki et al, 2020;Schlottau et al, 2020); rabbits in the lab vs. rabbits as pets (Mykytyn et al, 2021;Ruiz-Arrondo et al, 2020)). Moreover, wildlife hosts that are confirmed to shed multiple zoonotic viruses in natural settings (e.g., bats, (Peel et al, 2019)) can be much less tractable for laboratory investigations (for instance, requiring high biosecurity containment and very limited sample sizes).…”
Section: Mapping Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vero cells 30 , isolated from challenge studies in ferrets 31 or NHPs 32 , and is predicted to decrease furin activity 30 . The N74K residue is located in the N-terminal domain outside of the AZD1061 binding site and results in the loss of a glycan 33 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there has not been a field study that documented natural infection of SARS-CoV-2 in ferrets. In one household with 29 ferrets and 2 infected humans, there was no evidence of human-to-ferret transmission based on RT-PCR and ELISA tests [ 186 ].…”
Section: Animal Host Diversity Of Sars-cov-2mentioning
confidence: 99%