No abstract

evere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused the global COVID-19 pandemic infecting more than 111 million people and causing 2.4 million deaths. Clinical disease in humans ranges from asymptomatic infection to pneumonia, severe respiratory compromise, multi-organ failure and systemic inflammatory syndromes. The rapid expansion and prolonged nature of the COVID-19 pandemic and its accompanying morbidity, mortality and destabilizing socioeconomic effects have made the development of SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics and vaccines an urgent global health priority 1. Indeed, the emergency use authorization and rapid deployment of antibody-based countermeasures, including mAbs, immune plasma therapy and messenger RNA, and inactivated and viral-vectored vaccines has provided hope for curtailing disease and ending the pandemic. The spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virion binds the cell-surface receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) to promote entry into human cells 2. Because the spike protein is critical for viral entry, it has been targeted for vaccine development and therapeutic antibody interventions. SARS-CoV-2 S proteins are cleaved to yield S1 and S2 fragments. The S1 protein includes the N-terminal (NTD) and receptor-binding (RBD) domains, whereas the S2 protein promotes membrane fusion. The RBD is recognized by many potently neutralizing monoclonal antibodies 3-7 , protein-based inhibitors 8 and serum antibodies 9. The current suite of antibody therapeutics and vaccines was designed with a spike protein based on strains circulating during the early phases of the pandemic in 2020. More recently, variants with enhanced transmissibility have emerged in the United Kingdom (B.1.1.7), South Africa (B.1.351), Brazil (B.1.1.248) and elsewhere with multiple substitutions in the spike protein, including in the NTD and the receptor-binding motif (RBM) of the RBD. Preliminary studies with pseudoviruses suggest that neutralization by some antibodies and immune sera may be diminished against variants expressing mutations in the spike gene 10-13. Given these

Highlights d Develop system to map all SARS-CoV-2 RBD mutations that escape antibody binding d Escape maps predict which mutations emerge when virus grown in presence of antibody d Escape maps inform surveillance for possible antigenic evolution

Antibodies targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) are being developed as therapeutics and make a major contribution to the neutralizing antibody response elicited by infection. Here, we describe a deep mutational scanning method to map how all amino-acid mutations in the RBD affect antibody binding, and apply this method to 10 human monoclonal antibodies. The escape mutations cluster on several surfaces of the RBD that broadly correspond to structurally defined antibody epitopes. However, even antibodies targeting the same RBD surface often have distinct escape mutations. The complete escape maps predict which mutations are selected during viral growth in the presence of single antibodies, and enable us to design escape-resistant antibody cocktails–including cocktails of antibodies that compete for binding to the same surface of the RBD but have different escape mutations. Therefore, complete escape-mutation maps enable rational design of antibody therapeutics and assessment of the antigenic consequences of viral evolution.

The emergence of the highly transmissible B.1.1.529 Omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is concerning for antibody countermeasure efficacy because of the number of mutations in the spike protein. In this study, we tested a panel of anti-receptor-binding domain monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) corresponding to those in clinical use by Vir Biotechnology (S309, the parent mAb of VIR-7831 (sotrovimab)), AstraZeneca (COV2-2196 and COV2-2130, the parent mAbs of AZD8895 and AZD1061), Regeneron (REGN10933 and REGN10987), Eli Lilly (LY-CoV555 and LY-CoV016) and Celltrion (CT-P59) for their ability to neutralize an infectious B.1.1.529 Omicron isolate. Several mAbs (LY-CoV555, LY-CoV016, REGN10933, REGN10987 and CT-P59) completely lost neutralizing activity against B.1.1.529 virus in both Vero-TMPRSS2 and Vero-hACE2-TMPRSS2 cells, whereas others were reduced (COV2-2196 and COV2-2130 combination, ~12-fold decrease) or minimally affected (S309). Our results suggest that several, but not all, of the antibodies in clinical use might lose efficacy against the B.1.1.529 Omicron variant.